Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Measure, machine, money

Bibliographic Data

ID5134963
AuthorsFrank Engster (“Helle Panke” e.V. – Rosa Luxemburg Foundation Berlin, Germany, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume44
Issue2
Pages261-272
Publication date2020-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCapital & Class (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0309-8168 • E-ISSN: 2041-0980
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0309816820904030
OpenAlexW3009032634
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

The aim of the text is to clarify why machines are economically productive only in capitalism and therefore in our society are capitalistic machines. They are capitalist not only because they increase the productive power of the capitalist valorisation, but this valorisation first of all is producing these machines, or at least it produces their productivity and hence 'the machinic' of machines. To understand this production of the machinic, we must understand them, as, for example, Heidegger, Simondon or Deleuze and Guattari have shown, from their context: from their non-technical essence, from their connection with other machines and from the social essence of the machinic. But in this context, first of all and in the last instance, we have to understand with Marx their entanglement with the capitalist valorisation. This can be shown for three different types of machines: the physical machine, the calculation machine and the social machine: money. What all three have in common and almost defines them as machines is that all three naturalise relations by quantifying them. The classical physical machine quantifies the relation of nature, the calculation machine quantifies information and meaning, and the money machine quantifies the relations of our society. I will concentrate on the physical and the money machine only. The technique to quantify is for both the same: measurement. This quantification and naturalisation by measurement is why both are - although or especially because they are opposed types of machines - interfaces to the capitalist valorisation process, and in this functioning as interfaces, we have to search their non-technical essence

Capitalism · Economics · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Politics · Productivity · Sociology · Computer Science · History · Law · Marxism and Critical Theory · Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis · Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics · Artificial Intelligence

  • The wilderness fetish

    Open Access•C Greiner, Manuel Standop•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2026

  • Critique of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Paul Guyer et al.•Critique of Pure Reason•1998

  • Being and Event

    Alain Badiou, Oliver Feltham•Being and event•2006

  • The Age of the World Picture

    Open Access•Martin Heidegger•Science and the Quest for Reality•1977

  • Grundrisse

    Karl Marx•Readings in Economic Sociology•2002

  • On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects

    Open Access•Gilbert Simondon•Deleuze Studies•2011

  • Anti-Oedipus

    Félix Guattari, Gilles Deleuze•Anti-Oedipus•1983

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae