Functional Discourse Grammar - multifunctional problems and constructional solutions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5137775 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Matthew P Anstey, Matthew Anstey (0000-0003-0688-1809, Contextual Change (United States), corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Publication date | 2008-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling.2008.027 |
| OpenAlex | W2012627314 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 22 |
One of Functional Grammar's (FG) most important features is the so-called LAYERED STRUCTURE OF THE CLAUSE (LSC). The LSC is used as both a descriptive and explanatory construct, dividing the linguistic world into various hierarchically related layers, such as predicate, predication, and proposition layers. But problems with the LSC eventually led to the development of Functional Discourse Grammar, which divides FG's unitary LSC into two layers, the Interpersonal and Representational and also adds a third, Syntactic Layer, a long-standing desideratum for FG. Nevertheless, the present article argues that there are several problems remaining in FDG's LSC, namely, the place of operators and satellites, the use of a quasi-predicate logic notation, and the insertion of lexemes as parts-of-speech in the Representational Layer. Moreover, the third of these problems relates to a deeper issue, which concerns the understanding of what SEMANTICS refers to in FDG. Specifically, should it refer only those interpersonal/representational distinctions that are relevant to syntax, or should it embrace conceptualisation more broadly and refer to the speaker's intended meaning? Through a consideration of MULTIFUNCTIONALITY, the latter, broader definition of conceptually-relevant semantics is deemed superior, because multifunctionality requires a prising apart of the one-to-one function-to-form bond between semantics and syntax implicit in FDG. It is suggested that a reinterpretation of FDG along the lines of Construction Grammar offers a way of accounting for such multifunctionality satisfactorily
Construct (python library) · Emergent grammar · Generative grammar · Grammar · Interpersonal communication · Linguistics · Mildly context-sensitive grammar formalism · Political science · Predicate (mathematical logic) · Programming language · Proposition · Relational grammar · Unitary state · Communication · Computer Science · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Constructions
The architecture of the language faculty
The Noun Phrase
Tensions Between Discourse Structure and Conceptual Semantics
Acts and the relationship between discourse and grammar
Asian and African Studies
Syntactic theories and syntactic methodology
Aspects of a Cognitive-Pragmatic Theory of Language
The Theory of Functional Grammar
Foundational issues
Layers and operators in Functional Grammar
Agency and Voice
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,12 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2016 (8) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |