Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Trojan Horse Technologies

Smuggling Criminal-Legal Logics into Healthcare Practice

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5140901
AutoresElizabeth Chiarello (0000-0002-2131-2527, Saint Louis University, autor correspondente)
Ano2023
Volume88
Fascículo6
Páginas1131-1160
Data de publicação2023-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Sociological Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0003-1224 • E-ISSN: 1939-8271
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00031224231209445
OpenAlexW4388945268
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas14
Referências citadas86

In the throes of an intractable overdose crisis, U.S. pharmacists have begun to engage in an unexpected practice-policing patients. Contemporary sociological theory does not explain why. Theories of professions and frontline work suggest professions closely guard jurisdictions and make decisions based on the logics of their own fields. Theories of criminal-legal expansion show that non-enforcement fields have become reoriented around crime over the past several decades, but past work largely focuses on macro-level consequences. This article uses the case of pharmacists and opioids to develop a micro-level theory of professional field reorientation around crime, the Trojan Horse Framework. Drawing on 118 longitudinal and cross-sectional interviews with pharmacists in six states, I reveal how the use of prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs)-surveillance technology designed for law enforcement but implemented in healthcare-in conjunction with a set of field conditions motivates pharmacists to police patients. PDMPs serve as Trojan horse technologies as their use shifts pharmacists' routines, relationships with other professionals, and constructions of their professional roles. As a result, pharmacists route patients out of the healthcare system and leave them vulnerable to the criminal-legal system. The article concludes with policy recommendations and a discussion of future applications of the Trojan Horse Framework

Business · Computer security · Criminology · Enforcement · Field (mathematics · Guard (computer science · Health care · Law enforcement · Political science · Public relations · Trojan horse · Work (physics · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · Law · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

  • Clinical Advocacy

    Open Access•Alexandra Brewer, Stefan Timmerman•Journal of Health and Social…•2026

  • Handing Off

    Open Access•Elizabeth Chiarello, K Fong et al.•American Sociological Review•2026

  • Jurisdictional gerrymandering

    Open Access•Svetlana Zilberstein•Social Problems•2026

  • Long-Term Impacts of Incarceration Exposure and Social Network Stability in Later Life

    Open Access•Nan Feng, B Cornwell•The Prison Journal•2025

  • Disrupting the information order in health care

    Open Access•D Anthony, Amanda Stanhaus•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • Symbolic ambivalence

    Open Access•Yan Fang•Law & Society Review•2026

  • We can't change that while they're in the hospital”

    Open Access•Suzanne J Block, Laura Nicole Sisson et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2025

  • Decriminalization or police mission creep? Critical appraisal of law enforcement involvement in British Columbia, Canada's decriminalization framework

    Open Access•Liam Michaud, Jenn McDermid et al.•International Journal of Drug…•2024

  • Negotiating Decriminalization

    Open Access•Ely Aaronson•Annual Review of Criminology•2025

  • Goffmanian “Cooling” in Technology-Mediated Frontline Enforcement Work

    Open Access•Pegah Moradi, Karen Levy et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2025

  • Significant bodily intrusions”

    Open Access•A Myron Johnson, Anne K Johnson•Theoretical Criminology•2026

  • Trying to get down here when the dealer's closer

    Open Access•Kenneth Jaffe, Kaitlyn Jaffe et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • How professionals respond to the disruptive effects of artificial intelligence on their jurisdiction

    Open Access•Qin Chen, Qisi Chen et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • Bottom-up hybridity

    Open Access•Benjamin R Wei•Law & Society Review•2025

  • Navigating Conflict

    Calvin Morrill, Michael Musheno•Navigating Conflict•2018

  • The Rise of Professionalism

    Magali Sarfatti Larson•Rise of Professionalism•1977

  • Shaping Abortion Discourse

    Open Access•Myra Marx Ferree, William Anthony Gamson et al.•Shaping Abortion Discourse•2002

  • The System of Professions

    Andrew Abbott•System of Professions•1988

  • Pulled Over

    Charles R Epp, Steven Maynard-Moody et al.•Pulled Over•2014

  • Homeroom Security

    Aaron Kupchik•Homeroom security•2020

  • Understanding street-level bureaucracy

    Open Access•Peter Hupe, Michael Hill et al.•Understanding Street-Level…•2015

  • Street‐Level Bureaucracy Theory

    Steven Maynard‐moody, Shannon Portillo•The Oxford handbook of American…•2010

  • Digital Punishment

    Sarah Lageson, Sarah Esther Lageson•Digital Punishment•2020

  • Marked

    Devah Pager•Marked•2007

  • Moralizing Technology

    Peter-Paul Verbeek•Moralizing Technology•2011

  • The Changing Face of Heroin Use in the United States

    Theodore J Cicero, Matthew S Ellis et al.•JAMA Psychiatry•2014

  • The Opioid Crisis in Black Communities

    Open Access•Keturah James, Ayana Jordan•Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics•2018

  • CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain — United States, 2016

    Open Access•Deborah Dowell, Tamara M Haegerich et al.•MMWR. Surveillance Summaries•2016

  • Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Convergence Dilemma

    Derrick Bell, Derrick A Bell•Harvard Law Review•1980

  • When the State Meets the Street

    Bernardo Zacka•When the State Meets the Street•2017

  • The Culture of ControlCrime and Social Order in Contemporary Society

    David Garland•THE CULTURE OF CONTROL•2002

  • Cheating Welfare

    Kaaryn Gustafson, Kaaryn S Gustafson•Cheating welfare•2016

  • Predict and Surveil

    Sarah Brayne•Predict and Surveil•2020

  • Penal Populism

    Jeff Pratt, John Pratt•Penal Populism•2007

  • Cops, Teachers, Counselors

    Steven Maynard-Moody, Steven Maynard‐moody et al.•Cops, Teachers, Counselors•2003

  • A Theory of Fields

    Neil Fligstein, Doug Mcadam•A theory of fields•2012

  • Disciplining the Poor

    Joe So, Joe Soss et al.•Disciplining the Poor•2011

  • Governing Through Crime

    Jonathan Simon•Governing through Crime•2007

  • Punished

    Victor M Rios•Punished•2011

  • The Logic of Practice

    Pierre Bourdieu•The Logic of Practice•1990

  • The school-to-prison pipeline

    Kimberly L Barrett•Journal of Criminal Justice…•2011

  • Policing in the Era of Big Data

    Greg Ridgeway•Annual Review of Criminology•2017

  • Punishing Disease

    Mallory J Johnson•QED A Journal in GLBTQ Worldmaking•2019

  • Making the material routine

    Keith Guzik, Abdul Sesay et al.•Policing & Society•2019

  • The War on Drugs Comes to the Pharmacy Counter

    Open Access•Elizabeth Chiarello•Law & Social Inquiry•2014

  • Shaping Technology, Building Society

    Michael Patrick Lynch, Michael Lynch et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1993

  • The Business of Practicing Law

    Austin Sarat, Carroll Seron•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1997

  • Evolution and Convergence of State Laws Governing Controlled Substance Prescription Monitoring Programs, 1998-2011

    Corey S Davis, Matthew Pierce et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2014

  • From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies

    Open Access•Mark Bovens, Stavros Zouridis•Public Administration Review•2002

  • Race, Drugs, and Policing

    Open Access•Katherine Beckett, Kris Nyrop et al.•Criminology•2006

  • The Institutional Logics Perspective

    Patricia H Thornton, William Ocasio et al.•The institutional logics…•2012

  • Professional Dominance

    Open Access•Eliot Freidson, Robert A Manners•Professional Dominance•2017

  • Rehabilitation in the Punitive Era

    Open Access•Michelle S Phelps•Law & Society Review•2011

  • An invitation to reflexive sociology

    Pierre Bourdieu•An invitation to reflexive…•1992

  • Stereotypes in Context

    Open Access•Gitte Sommer Harrits•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Contextualizing Consequences

    Elizabeth Chiarello•Mobilization An International…•2013

  • Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service

    Justin B Bullock, Justin Bullock et al.•Information Polity•2020

  • Automating Inequality

    Hannah Lebovits•Public Integrity•2019

  • Materializing Morality

    Open Access•Peter-Paul Verbeek•Science Technology & Human Values•2006

  • Competing Institutions

    Open Access•Carol A Heimer•Law & Society Review•1999

  • Surveillance and System Avoidance

    Open Access•Sarah Brayne•American Sociological Review•2014

  • How organizational context affects bioethical decision-making

    Open Access•Elizabeth Chiarello•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Ruling in" and "ruling out

    Open Access•David Hughes, Lesley Griffiths•Social Science & Medicine•1997

  • Big Data Surveillance

    Open Access•Sarah Brayne•American Sociological Review•2017

  • Public Emergency Room Overcrowding in the Era of Mass Imprisonment

    Open Access•Armando Lara-Millán, Armando Lara‐millán•American Sociological Review•2014

  • Walking the Talk? What Employers Say Versus What They Do

    Open Access•Devah Pager, L Quillian•American Sociological Review•2005

  • The Practice Dynamics of Solo and Small Firm Lawyers

    Open Access•Jerry Van Hoy•Law & Society Review•1997

  • Control Creep

    Open Access•Matthew Innes, Martin Innes•Sociological Research Online•2001

  • Explaining Criminalization

    Valerie Jenne•Annual Review of Sociology•2004

  • DNA identification and surveillance creep

    Open Access•Dorothy Nelkin, Lori Andrews•Sociology of Health & Illness•1999

  • Legal Violence

    Cecilia Menjívar, Leisy J Abrego•American Journal of Sociology•2012

  • Why Do Some Occupations Pay More than Others? Social Closure and Earnings Inequality in the United States

    K A Weeden•American Journal of Sociology•2002

Obras citantes distintas14
Citações por ano7
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2026 (3)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 12
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae