Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Teak & Lead

Making Borders, Resources, and Territory in Colonial Burma

Bibliographic Data

ID5145444
AuthorsFrances O’morchoe (0000-0001-6326-2137, University of Oxford, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume28
Issue1
Pages23-46
Publication date2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeopolitics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1465-0045 • E-ISSN: 1557-3028
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14650045.2020.1815711
OpenAlexW3085876409
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited26

Through a comparative historical analysis of two sites on Myanmar’s borders with China and Thailand, this article explores how natural resources affected border-making in Zomia. Firstly, the article argues that demand for natural resources drove lowland states’ territorialisation of the highlands in the late nineteenth century, including their desire to demarcate borders. Secondly, local actors chose different political strategies in response to lowland state penetration. Some chose to attempt to repel lowland states, others to avoid them. The type of natural resources available (‘lootable’ versus ‘unlootable’ resources) enhanced or diminished the effectiveness of the political tactics chosen by local actors. Thirdly, the article explores whether local politics or the ‘knowability’ of natural resources determined the differential success of border-making in the region. This attention to natural resources can deepen histories of ‘state-escaping’ highland peoples. This also has implications for the question of human agency and environmental determinism in Zomia, a question which is often implicit but unaddressed when scholars use the concept of the ‘friction of terrain’. In the context of accelerating climate change and the global spread of pathogens, understanding the potential for agency of non-human objects is more important than ever. Drawing on archival materials from the Myanmar National Archives, India Office Records, and the British Library, this study gives insights into both the politics of this region today, and how natural resources affected border-making at the margins of states

Ancient history · Archaeology · Business · Colonialism · Economics · Economy · Geography · Political science · Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography · Cambodian History and Society · History · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Geology

  • Energizing dissensus

    Open Access•Asif Mehmood, Joshua J Cousins•Environment and Planning D…•2024

  • Remaking and Living with Resource Frontiers

    Jasnea Sarma, Hilary Oliva Faxon et al.•Geopolitics•2023

  • The Art of Not Being Governed

    James C Scott•Art of Not Being Governed•2017

  • The Galactic Polity

    Open Access•Stanley J Tambiah•Annals of the New York Academy of…•1977

  • Human territoriality

    Robert David Sack•Human territoriality•1986

  • Becoming Stateless

    Open Access•Tatsuki R Kataoka, Tatsuki Kataoka•Southeast Asian studies•2013

  • Imagining the borderlands

    Open Access•Yayoi Fujita Lagerqvist•Singapore Journal of Tropical…•2013

  • Greed and grievance in civil war

    Paul Collier•Oxford Economic Papers•2004

  • Friction

    Anna Lowenhaupt Tsing•Friction•2005

  • Margin to mainstream, periphery to center

    Open Access•Naoko Kumada•Asian Journal of Comparative…•2018

  • Territorialisation and marginalisation in the forested landscapes of Orissa, India

    Open Access•Kundan Kumar, J M Kerr•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Modernization and Centralization in Northern Thailand, 1875–1910

    Open Access•James Ansil Ramsay•Journal of Southeast Asian Studies•1976

  • From War Refugees to Immigrants

    Open Access•Wen-Chin Chang•International Migration Review•2001

  • Producing Intransigence

    A Ong•Contemporary Southeast Asia•2018

  • Scott's “Zomia,” or a Populist Post-modern History of Nowhere

    Tom Bra, Tom Brass•Journal of Contemporary Asia•2011

  • A Diamond Curse

    Open Access•Päivi Lujala, Nils Petter Gleditsch et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2005

  • Does Lootable Wealth Breed Disorder

    Open Access•Richard Snyder•Comparative Political Studies•2006

  • To Go Where No Han Could Go for Long

    Open Access•David A Bello•Modern China•2005

  • Mining, history, and the anti-state Wa

    Open Access•Magnus Fiskesjö•Journal of Global History•2010

  • The political ecology of war

    Open Access•Philippe Le Billon•Political Geography•2001

  • Terrain as insurgent weapon

    Open Access•Gastón Gordillo•Political Geography•2018

  • Geographies of Knowing, Geographies of Ignorance

    Open Access•Willem Van Schendel•Environment and Planning D…•2002

  • Violence and Ethnicity on a Qing Colonial Frontier

    Open Access•Donald S Sutton•Modern Asian Studies•2003

  • The Political Ecology of Forestry in Burma

    Gordon Brent Ingram, Raymond L Bryant•Pacific Affairs•1998

  • The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia

    Kenneth Ray Young, Alfred W Mccoy et al.•Pacific Affairs•1973

  • From Max Weber

    Max Weber, H H Gerth et al.•From Max Weber•2014

  • Territorialization and state power in Thailand

    Open Access•P Vandergeest, Nancy Lee Peluso•Theory and Society•1995

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2024 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae