The Dual Strategy Myth in Central American Policy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5145863 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mary Vanderlaan, Mary B Vanderlaan (Hartwick College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1984 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 199-224 |
| Publication date | 1984-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-1937 • E-ISSN: 2162-2736 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/165468 |
| OpenAlex | W2783062453 |
| Language | EN |
The Reagan administration is sending mixed messages on its policy in Central America, leading some observers to label the policy "schizoid" and influencing yet others to give the president the benefit of the doubt until policy implications become clearer or unavoidable. Commenting in July on White House policy as it has been iterated in the first half of 1983, Senator Christopher Dodd (1983), a leading administration critic, asserted that "there is total confusion in Washington as to what the administration's policies are, and there is a total confusion in Central America as to what U.S. intentions are." Similar charges have been made from both sides of the aisle in Congress.Almost sadly, these charges are not part of an opposition's political ploy, but in fact are rooted in speeches, position papers, and actions formulated by the president and his Central America policy team
Administration (probate law) · Aisle · Confusion · Mythology · Opposition (politics) · Political science · Politics · Reagan administration · History · International Relations in Latin America · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Governance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |