Secessionist Self-Determination
Some Lessons from Katanga, Biafra and Bangladesh
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5147693 |
|---|---|
| Autores | M Rafiqul Islam (0000-0001-8771-8661, University of Rajshahi, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 1985 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 211-221 |
| Data de publicação | 1985-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/002234338502200303 |
| OpenAlex | W2042397130 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 9 |
| Referências citadas | 19 |
The existing world order is frequently interrupted by secessionist claims. The present state-oriented solidarity for 'territorial integrity under all circumstances at any cost' has not succeeded in solving the problem. It has now become imperative for the international community to formulate principles and guidelines to cope with this problem. This paper examines three of the major separatist attempts since the Second World War and the way the rest of the world community reacted to them. The failure of Katanga and Biafra secessions and the success of the Bangladesh one were not isolated incidents. Rather these are probably normative for future claims in the sense that some lessons worthy of imitation may be derived from these experiences. Whilst the right to secession was denied in case of Katanga and Biafra, the Bangladesh situation indicates that the world community is willing to recognise a limited and orderly right to secession as the ultimate remedy under certain circumstances, particularly in extreme cases of the abuse and misuse of territorial integrity. Several factors distinguish the Bangladesh situation from the other two cases. In addition to a comparative study of these factors the paper develops certain common and influential criteria which the world community may increasingly recognise in responding to a future secessionist claim. This would in turn assist the international community in its concern for the establishment of a legal order to deal with post-colonial self-determination claims
Business · International community · Normative · Order (exchange) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Secession · Sociology · Solidarity · Sovereignty · State (computer science) · Territorial integrity · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law
Taiwan's Future National Identity
State Formation Under International Supervision and the Construction of Hierarchies in National Membership
Power and Recognition
Secession, legitimacy and the use of child soldiers
What drives support for separatism? Exposure to conflict and relative ethnic size in Biafra, Nigeria
We the peoples? The strange demise of self-determination
Mercenaries in the Congo and Biafra, 1960-1970
The Horn of Africa in the shadow of the cold war
Ethnic Identification and Nationalist Movements
Pakistan Post‐mortem and the Roots of Bangladesh
Secession and the Right of Self-Determination
The Crisis of Nationhood in Nigeria
The Domestic Jurisdiction of States in the Practice of the United Nations and Regional Organisations
Was “Biafra” at Any Time A State in International Law
Self–Determination in International Law
Self-Determination” and the Palestinians
Treaties and Changed Circumstances ( Rebus Sic Stantibus )
Self-Determination
Self-Determination
The Breakdown of Pakistan's Political System
Secession. The Legitimacy of Self-Determination
Modernisation and Political Disintegration
The Right to Self-Determination
The Last Days of United Pakistan
Is There a Case for Biafra
Intra-State Imperialism
The Limits of Self-Determination
| Obras citantes distintas | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,26 |
| Intervalo de citações | 1992 - 2023 (32) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 8 |