Mess among Disciplines
Interdisciplinarity in Environmental Research
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5147754 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrea Donaldson (0000-0003-0891-327X, Newcastle University, corresponding author), Andrew Donaldson, Neil Ward (0000-0002-0732-2278, University of East Anglia, corresponding author), Sue Bradley (Newcastle University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1521-1536 |
| Publication date | 2010-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1068/a42483 |
| OpenAlex | W2148925266 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
| References cited | 30 |
This paper discusses interdisciplinary collaboration between social and natural scientists from the perspective of 'mess'. The literature on interdisciplinarity has generated a series of conventions about what it means to conduct interdisciplinary research. Building on the experience of a research project that brought social and natural scientists together with local residents to study flooding, we argue that interdisciplinarity can be understood as a response to mess, to the irreducibly complex problems of the world. Mess can be dealt with as an epistemological or ontological problem. We argue that discursive conventions focus on the epistemological dimensions of mess and thus have their limits. By considering the ontological dimensions of mess the whole range of objects that are involved in interdisciplinary research is brought into focus
Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Geography · Social science · Sociology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Engineering · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · Philosophy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Interdisciplinarity and Geography
Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research
Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values
Mess in Science and Wicked Problems
Ontology and integrative research on Global Environmental Change
Climate change and transdisciplinary science
The persistence of ‘normal’ catchment management despite the participatory turn
Beyond disciplines
A typology of interdisciplinary collaborations
They don’t know what they are talking about’
Collaboration, creativity, conflict and chaos
Epistemic stability and epistemic adaptability
Transforming universities
A new normative economics for the formation of shared social values
Guiding carbon farming using interdisciplinary mixed methods mapping
Radical interdisciplinarity
Integrating scientific and local knowledge to address environmental conflicts
Moving from features to functions
Changes in perceptions of transdisciplinary science over time
Thinking complex interconnections
Bridging the geo‐divide
The wicked city
Political Ecology
Experimental geographies
Bringing Britain into being
Amongst the disciplines
The methodology of the social sciences
Science in action
The new production of knowledge
The invention of modern science
Q Methodology
Representing and Intervening
Interdisciplinarity and boundary work
Interdisciplinarity and social power
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects
Futures of Transdisciplinarity
What do you mean?’ The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research
The emergence of interdisciplinary knowledge in problem‐focused research
The lively process of interdisciplinarity
Structuring subjectivities? Using Q methodology in human geography
Interdisciplinarity within and beyond geography
Logics of interdisciplinarity
We Have Never Been Modern
After Method
Pandora's hope
Mapping knowledge controversies
Object Lessons
Barriers to Research Collaboration across Disciplines
Researching the Sustainable City
The Body Multiple
Politiques de la nature
Politics of Nature
The economy of qualities
| Unique citing works | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,63 |
| Citation span | 2010 - 2026 (17) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 26 |