The perceptions of political and civil society actors on securitisation of sea rescue NGOs in the Mediterranean
The case of Italy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5149458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Selcen Öner (0000-0001-6276-7221, Bahçeşehir University, corresponding author), Mattia Cirino (LUISS School of Government, MA Programme on Law and Government of the EU, MA LUISS University, Salerno, Italy) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 392-418 |
| Publication date | 2023-03-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Journal of North African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1362-9387 • E-ISSN: 1743-9345 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13629387.2021.1989586 |
| OpenAlex | W3207653267 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 18 |
The role of maritime NGOs in the Mediterranean has increased, especially during the ‘migration crisis’, to compensate for EU member states, which are mostly hesitant to intervene and act in solidarity with each other despite being the main responsible actors for border controls. This article focuses on the case of Italy, which is one of the mostly affected countries from the flow of irregular migrants, especially from Libya. It analyses the securitisation of sea rescue NGOs, especially during the Lega-M5S coalition government (June 2018–September 2019), based on face-to-face in-depth elite and expert interviews conducted in 2019 with representatives of sea rescue NGOs, a UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees) representative in Italy, a mayor from southern Italy, and several Italian politicians in Rome. It is argued that sea rescue NGOs were securitised during this period, particularly in Italy, to become the new ‘scapegoats’. In addition to Lega, one of the coalition partners, several other actors, such as Frontex (European Border and Frontier Agency) and the Italian media, were influential actors during this process. As long as political instability continues in Africa, particularly Libya, and the socioeconomic gap between Europe and Africa remains, sea rescue NGOs are not needed as a ‘pull factor’. Instead, migrants will go on risking their lives by making a very risky journey across African states before trying to cross the Mediterranean Sea to realise their ‘European dream
Agency (philosophy · Business · Civil society · Development economics · Economy · Elite · European union · Frontier · Government (linguistics · International trade · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Refugee · Sociology · Solidarity · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Peacebuilding and International Security
Security
The Politics of Insecurity
Criminalizing solidarity
The ‘refugee crisis’ in Italy as a crisis of legitimacy
The 2015 Refugee Crisis was not a Turning Point
Straightjacketing migrant rescuers? The code of conduct on maritime NGOs
Deaths, Interventions, Humanitarianism and Human Rights in the Mediterranean ‘Migration Crisis’
Navigating the Central Mediterranean in a Time of ‘Crisis’
Qualitative Research
Right-wing populism and the criminalization of sea-rescue NGOs
Repoliticization Through Search and Rescue? Humanitarian NGOs and Migration Management in the Central Mediterranean
Sea of blood
Counting Migrants' Deaths at the Border
Guilt by association? The criminalisation of sea rescue NGOs in Italian media
The centre no longer holds
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |