Letters, sounds and things
Orthography, phonetics and metaphysics in Wilkins’sEssay(1668)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5152643 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Isermann (Heidelberg University, corresponding author), Michael M Isermann (Heidelberg University) |
| Year | 2007 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 213-256 |
| Publication date | 2007-11-22 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Historiographia Linguistica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0302-5160 • E-ISSN: 1569-9781 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/hl.34.2.03ise |
| OpenAlex | W2061930778 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 21 |
For a long time, and well beyond the publication of John Wilkins'sEssay Towards a Real Character(1668), a latent tension characterised the orthographic tradition. It was caused by two incompatible principles whose problematic relationship had never been addressed. One is the idea of the logical, chronological and semiotic primacy of speech over writing, or of sound over character, a principle which lives on in modern linguistics. The other is the doctrine of an abstract unity of sound/potestasand character/figurain the letter/littera, an axiom that appears to have been abandoned only with the emancipation of modern phonetics from its former orthographic frame of reference. With the advent of the real-character movement in the 17th century, a way was suddenly opened up for the problematic issue to be discussed and resolved. Since a real, i.e., non-sound-related, character implied at least a non-priority of speech over writing - if not a priority of writing -, the first principle could be reformulated so as to be made consonant with the idea of an abstractlittera. This paper tries to bring out Wilkins's sophisticated discussion of thelittera, his attempt to localise the abstract unity of sound and character in the configuration of the articulatory organs, as well as the utilisation of hislitteraconcept for his design of a real character of sounds. In a parallel line of argument, it is claimed that Wilkins's orthography, or doctrine of letters, forms the conceptual equivalent to his metaphysics, or science of things. More than that, the two disciplines are so interlocked that things and letters can be seen to converge in letter-things, or thing-letters
Argument (complex analysis · Art · Character (mathematics · Doctrine · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Metaphysics · Relation (database · Semiotics · Computer Science · Historical Linguistics and Language Studies · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistics and language evolution · Mathematics · Philosophy
A Course of Lectures on the Theory of Language, and Universal Grammar
An Essay concerning Human Understanding
Phonetic Transcription
Didascalocophus or The Deaf and Dumb Man's Tutor
John Hart's Works on English Orthography and Pronunciation (1551, 1569, 1570).
Studies in the History of Linguistics
Universal Languages and Scientific Taxonomy in the Seventeenth Century
Louis Meigret, Humaniste Et Linguiste
The Concept of Articulatory Settings
William Holder and other 17th-century phoneticians
Speculations about thePotestas Litterarumin medieval grammar (11th through 13th centuries)
| Highly cited | No |
|---|