The Metaphorical Use of Avuncular Terminology in Buriad Diaspora Relationships with Homeland and Host Society
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5154669 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sayana Namsaraeva (0000-0003-4670-9448, Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 201-230 |
| Publication date | 2010-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Inner Asia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1464-8172 • E-ISSN: 2210-5018 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/000000010794983540 |
| OpenAlex | W2079190176 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
The significance of the kinship relationship between the mother's brother and sister's son (avunculate) was one of the most discussed topics in the history of social anthropology. Two theories of pre-Schneiderian age - descent and alliance approaches - both consider avuncular relations as being tense and contradictive, associated with certain privileges of the maternal uncle and his senior hierarchical position in relation to Ego. This paper tries to establish the relevance of this classical anthropological theme to contemporary social and political realities in Buriad society, specifically to extend the discussion of the classificatory/metaphorical use of avuncular kinship terminology to a new context - that of diaspora relationships with homeland and host society. A recent tendency in kinship studies argues that kinship terminology can be employed flexibly to handle relationships of various kinds, and suggests that kinship terms should often be understood as referring to a kind of social relationship rather than to a specifically genealogical connection. Two cases, which I present in the paper, show how Buriad diaspora communities in Mongolia and Inner Mongolia (China) involve the avuncular relationship to define their concerns and tensions in relation both to colonisers in the homeland in Russia and to the social inequality of migrants in their host societies. This local phenomenon shows that kinship terminology continues to have a wider social significance, being used, for example, to express current inequalities of power and the impact of political changes on local experience
Diaspora · Epistemology · Fictive kinship · Genealogy · Homeland · Kinship · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Terminology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Gender Studies · History · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Law · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
‘Remote’ areas and minoritized spatial orders at the Russia – Mongolia border
Invisible Sovereigns
Politicisation of Quasi-Indigenousness on the Russo-Chinese Frontier
The Persistence of the Nation-State at the Chinese-Kazakh Border
Appendix
Prostitution and the Transformation of the Chinese Trading Town of Ereen
Frontier Encounters
A Heap of Leaves or Fellow Travellers
Detachable Groups and Kinship Tensions
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,64 |
| Citation span | 2012 - 2024 (13) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |