Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scientific Fraud

Social Deviance or the Failure of Virtue

Bibliographic Data

ID5162807
AuthorsC J List (Professor List is in the Department of Philosophy, State University College of Arts and Sciences at Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY 12901), Christian List (0000-0003-1627-800X, SUNY Plattsburgh, corresponding author)
Year1985
Volume10
Issue4
Pages27-35
Publication date1985-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/016224398501000403
PMID11649815
OpenAlexW2010101387
LanguageEN
Citations received4

This article asks what it is about the nature of science that might explain the phenomenon of scientific fraud? What philosophical theory of scientific change might account for the existence of fraud and thus point the way toward a possible remedy? Three essential components comprise a scientific fraud. First, there must be at least one individual who is deceived. Second, there must be something which does the deceiving-a paper, a graph, a fossil, etc.-which carries or is the vehicle for the deceptive message. Third, there must be a model. Without a model, no other scientist would take the deception seriously, that is, accept the fake for the real thing. Recognizing the necessity of a model can help analysts locate more clearly the means of deception in fraud. Tests, procedures, ways of reporting evidence, and uses of graphs and diagrams, for example, are potential models. If a fraudulent scientist does not at least mimic the current standards and techniques of the discipline, then he or she has no hope whatsoever of success.' In the Piltdown fraud, someone seeded an archaeological site with bones and teeth that appeared to constitute evidence for an early human in Britain. These remains acted as a deceptive message modeled on other recognizable models, such as previous finds in Germany. This deceptive message had a quite specific group of signal-receivers: ethnocentric British scientists

Criminology · Political science · Scientific Misconduct · Statistics · Virtue · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Revisiting the Foundations of the Family Resemblance Approach to Nature of Science

    Open Access•Gürol Irzik, Robert Nola•Science & Education•2023

  • Explaining Hwang-Gate

    Open Access•Herbert Gottweis, Byoungsoo Kim et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2010

  • Allocating Credit and Blame in Science

    Open Access•D E Chubin•Science Technology & Human Values•1988

  • Quand c'est la science qui bricole, c'est du sérieux

    Open Access•G Anichini•Techniques & culture•2013

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,11
Citation span1988 - 2023 (36)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae