Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Obligation of Intellectuals

Bibliographic Data

ID5163370
AuthorsWilliam M Epstein (Chinese University of Hong Kong), William Epstein (0000-0001-7962-3814, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year1990
Volume15
Issue2
Pages244-247
Publication date1990-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/016224399001500205
OpenAlexW1969723987
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited8

The controversy surrounding Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals (CRB; Epstein 1990) stems from its critical toneespecially in earlier drafts, its unflattering findings, and its use of deception to study journal publication processes. If the tone of CRB had rung a less challenging note; if its qualitative analysis had been summed up as a whispered reminder that social work referees might profit from greater attention to their comments; if its quantitative analysis had been simply reported as disconfirmatory; then perhaps little would have been made of the paper. Even assuming that a charge would have been brought, the National Committee on Inquiry of the National Association of Social Workers might have accepted the research with more collegial regard. As it was, the National Committee sought to banish me from social work. If the reviews in CRB are typical of social work's standards, then the editors and referees in the field have something to be defensive about. The better reviews came from journals that originated outside of social work organizations per se. Many referees missed the glaring methodological weaknesses of the pseudomanuscript. Many reviews were too brief. Many were incoherent, inaccurate, trivial, and highly individualistic. The response to CRB should have been tempered by the quality of the social work literature itself. In the six-year period from 1978 to 1983, only 12 studies from among an estimated 6,500 or more papers that appeared in the studied journals passed a very minimal methodological screen: randomly selected controls (Rubin 1985). Yet most of these were flawed. Indeed only one stands up as an example of high-quality research (Stein and Test 1980)

Law and economics · Obligation · Political science · Sociology · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Social Work Education and Practice

  • What Makes Fake News Appeal to You? Empirical Evidence from the Tweets Related to Covid-19 Vaccines

    Open Access•Minjung Park, Sangmi Chai•SAGE Open•2024

  • Puck in the Laboratory

    Open Access•Jim Schnabel•Science Technology & Human Values•1994

  • Antonio Gramsci Revisited

    Open Access•Augustí Nieto‐galan, Agusti Nieto-Galan•History of Science•2011

  • Peer-review practices of psychological journals

    Open Access•Douglas Peters, Douglas P Peters et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1982

  • On Being Sane in Insane Places

    Open Access•David Rosenhan, D L Rosenhan•Science•1973

  • Alternative to Mental Hospital Treatment

    Leonard I Stein•Archives of General Psychiatry•1980

  • Studying Journal Editors

    William M Epstein, William Epstein•IRB Ethics and Human Research•1989

  • Confirmational Response Bias Among Social Work Journals

    Open Access•William M Epstein, William Epstein•Science Technology & Human Values•1990

  • Something Works

    Ray J Thomlison•Social Work•1984

  • Practice Effectiveness

    Allen Rubin•Social Work•1985

  • Recent evaluations of social work

    William J Reid, Patricia Hanrahan•Social Work•1982

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,09
Citation span1994 - 2024 (31)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae