Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Life history of Eulemur fulvus rufus From 1988-1998 in Southeastern Madagascar

Bibliographic Data

ID5163468
AuthorsDeborah J Overdorff (The University of Texas at Austin, corresponding author), Adina M Merenlender (0000-0002-0681-8642, University of California, Berkeley), Pierre Talata (Centre National de la Recherche Appliquée au Developpement Rural), Albert Telo (Centre National de la Recherche Appliquée au Developpement Rural), Zoe A Forward (The Ohio State University)
Year1999
Volume108
Issue3
Pages295-310
Publication date1999-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Physical Anthropology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-9483 • E-ISSN: 1096-8644
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199903)108:3<295::aid-ajpa5>3.3.co;2-h
OpenAlexW4248880641
LanguageEN

In this study, we compare the life-history patterns of male and female Eulemur fulvus rufus based on longitudinal data collected on individuals from two study groups from 1988–1998 in southeastern Madagascar. Mean group size was 9.5 individuals, and groups either contained more adult males than females or equal numbers of both sexes. Females reproduced for the first time between 2 and 4 years of age and reproduced each year, although the mean interbirth interval between surviving offspring was 2.1 years. An average of two adult females reproduced annually in each social group, and age and body weight may positively influence reproductive success. Females also appear to be philopatric but not female-bonded. Young natal males immigrated between 3 and 4.5 years of age and may join a new group within 6–12 months based on the age of emigrants. Once in a social group, they remained until old age, although a male's spatial position in the social group varied with age. Young nonnatal males were members of the social core and had the first opportunity to mate with all estrous females. Older males were peripheral to the social group and mated with females later in their cycle. We hypothesize that group size, the number of females in the group, and individual variation in reproductive success is influenced by several ecological conditions at this site: extreme variability in food availability during reproductive periods, the lack of large food patches, low plant species diversity, and small numbers of important aseasonal food sources such as Ficus species. Am J Phys Anthropol 108:295–310, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Biology · Offspring · Philopatry · Population · Pregnancy · Reproductive success · Zoology · Animal Behavior and Reproduction · Demography · Ecology · Plant and animal studies · Primate Behavior and Ecology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae