Inequalities in the access to healthy urban structure and housing
An analysis of the Brazilian census data
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5167656 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Antonio Fernando Boing (0000-0001-9331-1550, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina), Alexandra Crispim Boing (0000-0001-7792-4824, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina), V Subramanian (0000-0003-2365-4165, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, U.S.A.) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 37 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | e00233119-e00233119 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Cadernos de Saude Publica (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0102-311X • E-ISSN: 1678-4464 |
| Editorial | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/0102-311x00233119 |
| PMID | 34190754 |
| OpenAlex | W3175654830 |
| SCIELO_PID | S0102-311X2021000605014 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 15 |
This study aims (1) to test the association between access to basic sanitation/hygiene services in Brazilian households with their householders' socioeconomic and demographic characteristics; (2) to analyze the distribution of urban health-relevant elements in the census tracts according to their income, education and race/color composition. The information come from the 2010 Brazilian Demographic Census, which collected data regarding both household conditions and urban structure of the census tracts. Prevalence ratios were calculated using crude and adjusted Poisson regression models. The proportional distribution of the census-tract urban structure was performed, according to the deciles of the exploratory variables, and the ratios and the absolute differences between the extreme deciles were calculated. Around 4.8% of the households had no piped water, 34.7% had no sewage collection system, 9.8% had no garbage collection and 39% were considered inadequate. Families whose householders were black, indigenous or brown had lower income and educational level, and lived in the North, Northeast, and Central West regions. They were more likely to be considered inappropriate for not having piped water, sewage collection system, and garbage collection. Moreover, sectors where the majority of the population was black, had lower educational levels and lower income had significantly poor paving, street lighting, afforestation, storm drain, sidewalk and wheelchair ramp. This study analyzed national data from 2010 and provides a baseline for future studies and government planning. The relevant social inequalities reported in this study need to be addressed by effective public policies
Census · Decile · Environmental health · Geography · Household income · Poisson regression · Population · Sanitation · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Statistics · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Demography · Environmental Engineering · Environmental Science · Medicine · Urban and Rural Development Challenges · Urban Transport and Accessibility
Lifelong Learning and Education in Healthy and Sustainable Cities
Measuring Coverage in MNCH
Residential green spaces and mortality
Built environment and cardio‐metabolic health
Housing Disadvantage and Poor Mental Health
Achieving the SDGs
Living environment and its relationship to depressive mood
Neighbourhood built environment and physical function among mid-to-older aged adults
Factors influencing household access to drinking water in Nigeria
Metrópole, legislação e desigualdade
Basics Inequality
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |