Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Advisory Committees in Osha and EPA

Their Use in Regulatory Decisionmaking

Bibliographic Data

ID5188264
AuthorsNicholas A Ash́ford (0000-0003-3572-268X, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, corresponding author)
Year1984
Volume9
Issue1
Pages72-82
Publication date1984-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/016224398400900109
OpenAlexW1993114521
LanguageEN
Citations received11

Federal agencies regulating the production and use of toxic substances increasingly have utilized citizen advisory committees to help shape the form of that regulation. Both the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) turn to such committees for recommendations on a variety of subjects, and the advisory committee has become an especially important source of federal policy on toxic substances. Recently, the discovery of a Reagan administration hit list naming many members of EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB) whose views were no longer acceptable raised concern about questionable political manipulation of government advisory committees in general.' This article examines the creation and use of advisory committees in the regulation of toxic substances in manufacturing, and suggests mechanisms to insure and improve the effectiveness and public service functions of of these and similar committees

Advisory committee · Business · Environmental health · Political science · Chemical Safety and Risk Management · Medicine · Public Administration

  • Peer Review in the Regulatory Process

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Science Technology & Human Values•1985

  • Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning

    Open Access•Thomas C Beierle, David M Konisky•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2000

  • Developing a Typology of Roles for STEM-Trained Professionals in AI Policy Engagement

    Open Access•Yi-Xiang Shawn Sun, Bailey McOwen et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2026

  • Drinking Water Quality in Indian Water Policies, Laws, and Courtrooms

    Open Access•Aviram Sharma•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2017

  • NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India

    Open Access•Poonam Pandey, Aviram Sharma•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2017

  • Analytical debates and policy learning

    Open Access•Hank C Jenkins‐smith, Hank C Jenkins-Smith•Policy Sciences•1988

  • Expertise, Regulatory Science and the Evaluation of Technology and Risk

    Open Access•David Demortain•Minerva•2017

  • Procedural choices in regulatory science

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Technology in Society•1995

  • Politics and the Erosion of Federal Scientific Capacity

    Kathleen M Rest, Michael Halpern et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2007

  • Using Social Goals to Evaluate Public Participation in Environmental Decisions

    Open Access•Thomas C Beierle•Review of Policy Research•1999

  • Science in Environmental Conflicts

    Open Access•Connie P Ozawa•Sociological Perspectives•1996

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,27
Citation span1985 - 2026 (42)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae