Advisory Committees in Osha and EPA
Their Use in Regulatory Decisionmaking
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5188264 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nicholas A Ash́ford (0000-0003-3572-268X, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1984 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-82 |
| Publication date | 1984-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/016224398400900109 |
| OpenAlex | W1993114521 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
Federal agencies regulating the production and use of toxic substances increasingly have utilized citizen advisory committees to help shape the form of that regulation. Both the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) turn to such committees for recommendations on a variety of subjects, and the advisory committee has become an especially important source of federal policy on toxic substances. Recently, the discovery of a Reagan administration hit list naming many members of EPA's Science Advisory Board (SAB) whose views were no longer acceptable raised concern about questionable political manipulation of government advisory committees in general.' This article examines the creation and use of advisory committees in the regulation of toxic substances in manufacturing, and suggests mechanisms to insure and improve the effectiveness and public service functions of of these and similar committees
Advisory committee · Business · Environmental health · Political science · Chemical Safety and Risk Management · Medicine · Public Administration
Peer Review in the Regulatory Process
Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning
Developing a Typology of Roles for STEM-Trained Professionals in AI Policy Engagement
Drinking Water Quality in Indian Water Policies, Laws, and Courtrooms
NGOs, Controversies, and “Opening Up” of Regulatory Governance of Science in India
Analytical debates and policy learning
Expertise, Regulatory Science and the Evaluation of Technology and Risk
Procedural choices in regulatory science
Politics and the Erosion of Federal Scientific Capacity
Using Social Goals to Evaluate Public Participation in Environmental Decisions
Science in Environmental Conflicts
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,27 |
| Citation span | 1985 - 2026 (42) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 10 |