Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ethical Issues in Proprietary Restrictions on Research Results

Bibliographic Data

ID5198236
AuthorsAlan H Goldman (0000-0001-8907-5129, University of Miami, corresponding author)
Year1987
Volume12
Issue1
Pages22-30
Publication date1987-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/016224398701200103
OpenAlexW27097179
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited3

The longstanding debate over patents and other proprietary restrictions on the results of university-based research has been rekindled lately by developments in biotechnology with enormous economic potential.' That debate has taken on added significance as commercial ties between university scientists and outside corporations have also increased. This paper assesses the value issues raised by such ties, focusing initially on the option of patents for intellectual products. Patents make up one possible form of proprietary protection for the results of university research. The alternatives for university researchers include open revelation with no attempt to control the marketing of products, patenting products and depositing the patents with foundations connected with the universities or depositing patents with government or nonprofit agencies unconnected with the universities. Researchers might also keep their research results secret at the request of either the government or private corporations that have financed the research. If patents are taken, licenses to manufacture and distribute products can then be granted exclusively or nonexclusively, with or without royalties. Patents on the results of university research can be viewed as proprietary rights over certain forms of newly discovered knowledge; but knowledge, either in terms of psychological states of

Business · Economics · Intellectual property · Management · Political science · Public relations · Revelation · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law

  • Perceptions of Research Misconduct and an Analysis of Their Correlates

    John M Braxton, Alan E Bayer•The Journal of Higher Education•1994

  • Policy Incentives and Constraints on Scientific and Technical Information

    Open Access•Vivian Weil•Science Technology & Human Values•1988

  • Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention

    Kenneth J Arrow•Rate and Direction of Inventive…•1962

  • The structure of scientific revolutions

    Dennis Holland, Thomas S Kuhn•La Structure des révolutions…•1976

  • The Entitlement Theory of Distributive Justice

    Alan H Goldman, Inc The Journal Of Philosophy•The Journal of Philosophy•1976

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,05
Citation span1988 - 1994 (7)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae