Imputation methods for mixed datasets in bioarchaeology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5254527 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Ryan-Despraz (0000-0002-0794-4317, University of Bern), A Wissler (0000-0001-7129-5342, McMaster University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 187-187 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1866-9557 • E-ISSN: 1866-9565 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-024-02078-2 |
| PMID | 39450370 |
| OpenAlex | W4403701698 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 57 |
Missing data is a prevalent problem in bioarchaeological research and imputation could provide a promising solution. This work simulated missingness on a control dataset (481 samples × 41 variables) in order to explore imputation methods for mixed data (qualitative and quantitative data). The tested methods included Random Forest (RF), PCA/MCA, factorial analysis for mixed data (FAMD), hotdeck, predictive mean matching (PMM), random samples from observed values (RSOV), and a multi-method (MM) approach for the three missingness mechanisms (MCAR, MAR, and MNAR) at levels of 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% missingness. This study also compared single imputation with an adapted multiple imputation method derived from the R package "mice". The results showed that the adapted multiple imputation technique always outperformed single imputation for the same method. The best performing methods were most often RF and MM, and other commonly successful methods were PCA/MCA and PMM multiple imputation. Across all criteria, the amount of missingness was the most important parameter for imputation accuracy. While this study found that some imputation methods performed better than others for the control dataset, each imputation method has advantages and disadvantages. Imputation remains a promising solution for datasets containing missingness; however when making a decision it is essential to consider dataset structure and research goals
Data mining · Imputation (statistics · Missing data · Statistics · Computer Science · Data Analysis with R · Mathematics · Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference · Statistical Methods and Inference
Missing data in bioarchaeology II
Analysis of data consistency identifies measurement abnormality in Howells' craniometric test data set
Evaluation of missing data imputation methods for human osteometric measurements
Missing data in bioarchaeology I
Applied Logistic Regression
Modern Applied Statistics with S
Generalized Linear Models
Much Ado About Nothing
MissMDA
What Improves with Increased Missing Data Imputations?
Imputation with the R Package VIM
Tuning multiple imputation by predictive mean matching and local residual draws
Regression Models for Ordinal Data
MissForest—non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data
A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non‐response
Fully conditional specification in multivariate imputation
Missing data
Regression Shrinkage and Selection Via the Lasso
Multiple imputation using chained equations
Mice
Methods for estimating missing human skeletal element osteometric dimensions employed in the revised fully technique for estimating stature
Stature estimation in prehistoric Native Americans of Ohio
Missing Data Imputation Using Morphoscopic Traits and Their Performance in the Estimation of Ancestry
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |