The affordances of extreme speech

Bibliographic Data

ID5260614
AuthorsEmillie De Keulenaar (0000-0001-7428-0461, University of Groningen, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume10
Issue2
Publication date2023-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBig Data & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/20539517231206810
OpenAlexW4388131786
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited16

New media studies invested in online political conflict, radical and antagonistic subcultures have taken an interest in the affordances that shape memes, vernaculars and online political communication. One often overlooked affordance is the ensemble of social, communication, platform and legal frameworks stipulating what users can and cannot say, which I call "speech affordances." To explore this concept, I look at the strategic communication of 4chan, Twitter and YouTube subcultures tied to a historical meme, "Kekistan," often perceived as a key example of the ideological cacophony of the 2015-2017 online "culture wars." I focus on how 4chan's policy of user anonymity, YouTube's unmoderated comment sections and Twitter's more proactive moderation practices brought some influencers to alter the original connotations of the meme into "overt" messages tolerable to Twitter and YouTube out-groups and platform moderation policies. Speech affordances bear methodological implications for historical studies of speech moderation and the overall mechanisms in which problematic language adapts to spaces with distinct speech norms

Affordance · Anonymity · Computer security · Human–computer interaction · Ideology · Internet privacy · Moderation · Political science · Politics · Social media · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access