The end of 'small biology'? Some thoughts about biomedicine and big science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5260692 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emanuele Ratti (0000-0003-1409-8240, University of Notre Dame, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2016-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/2053951716678430 |
| OpenAlex | W2557033990 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 16 |
In biology-as in other scientific fields-there is a lively opposition between big and small science projects. In this commentary, I try to contextualize this opposition in the field of biomedicine, and I argue that, at least in this context, big science projects should come first
Biology · Biomedicine · Data science · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Technoscience · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research · Law · Philosophy · Science, Research, and Medicine
| Citations per year | 0.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Highly cited | No |