Formally comparing topic models and human-generated qualitative coding of physician mothers' experiences of workplace discrimination
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5261071 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Adam S Miner (0000-0002-5125-4735, Stanford University), Samuel Alexander Stewart (0000-0001-5789-8390, Stanford University, corresponding author), Meghan C Halley (0000-0002-5031-9840, Ethics and Public Policy Center), Livingston Krumah Nelson (0000-0001-8948-300X, University of British Columbia), Eleni Linos (0000-0002-5856-6301, Stanford University) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20539517221149106 |
| OpenAlex | W4317910427 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 47 |
Differences between computationally generated and human-generated themes in unstructured text are important to understand yet difficult to assess formally. In this study, we bridge these approaches through two contributions. First, we formally compare a primarily computational approach, topic modeling, to a primarily human-driven approach, qualitative thematic coding, in an impactful context: physician mothers' experience of workplace discrimination. Second, we compare our chosen topic model to a principled alternative topic model to make explicit study design decisions meriting consideration in future research. By formally contrasting computationally generated (i.e. topic modeling) and human-generated (i.e. thematic coding) knowledge, we shed light on issues of interest to several audiences, notably computational social scientists who wish to understand study design tradeoffs, and qualitative researchers who may wish to leverage computational methods to improve the speed and reproducibility of labor-intensive coding. Although useful in other domains, we highlight the value of fast, reproducible methods to better understand experiences of workplace discrimination
Data science · Qualitative research · Sociology · Thematic analysis · Topic model · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Computer Science · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Science and Policy Research · Artificial Intelligence
Pragmatic Sensemaking
Comparing Bertopic Outputs With Human-Coded Themes
Identifying features of risk periods for suicide attempts using document frequency and language use in electronic health records
Enotourist satisfaction
Balancing human and machine coding
Public engagement with Covid-19 preprints
Providing a comprehensive thematic review of the Science-Policy Interface (SPI)
Participant journaling as a data collection method in management education research
Bridging the digital divide in the pharmaceutical industry
How to advance employment discrimination research in an era of big data and analytics
With eyes of a machine
People’s voices for sustainability – Exploring expectations for participatory democratic practices in Europe
The pivotal role of an enabling socio-structural context for farmer's persistent engagement in sustainable tea farming approaches
Text as Data
What's a parent to do? Measuring cultural logics of parenting with computational text analysis
SciPy 1.0
Dynamic topic models
Text Mining Infrastructure in R
Topicmodels
Comparing grounded theory and topic modeling
Array programming with NumPy
A correlated topic model of Science
LDAvis
Coefficients of Determination in Logistic Regression Models—A New Proposal
Exploring the Space of Topic Coherence Measures
Probabilistic topic models
Framed by Gender
Coding, counting and cultural cartography
Topic modeling for frame analysis
Paradigm Wars Revisited
Structural Topic Models for Open‐Ended Survey Responses
Text Preprocessing For Unsupervised Learning
Text as Data
Analysing discourse around Covid-19 in the Australian Twittersphere
Algorithmic management in a work context
Adapting computational text analysis to social science (and vice versa)
The Motherhood Wage Penalty by Work Conditions
Is There a Career Penalty for Mothers' Time Out? A Comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States
The Future of Coding
Computational Grounded Theory
Getting a Job
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |