Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Causal powers, causal questions, and the place of regularity information in causal attribution

Bibliographic Data

ID5267764
AuthorsPeter A White (0000-0002-9080-6678, University of Wales, corresponding author)
Year1992
Volume83
Issue2
Pages161-188
Publication date1992-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02433.x
OpenAlexW2011140389
LanguageEN
Citations received4

This article extends the causal powers theory of causal processing (White, 1989) by dealing with the use of regularity (e.g. covariation) information under the terms of the theory. The paper begins by arguing that regularity information is not basic to causal attribution because it is neither necessary nor sufficient for causal attribution. The type of information preferred for causal attribution, and the way in which it is used, are determined primarily by the type of causal question implicity or explicitly posed, in accordance with the constraint to provide something that counts as an answer to the question posed. Thus, types of regularity information are preferred for some types of causal question, specifically those referring to multiple occasions, but are not preferred for those referring to single occasions. Regularity information may still be used when preferred types of information are not available, and for two purposes: (i) ascertaining whether some thing or person has a certain causal power, and (ii) judging the strength of a power or a liability, when the effect to be explained concerns a relation between a power of one thing or person and a liability of another

Attribution · Causal decision theory · Causal model · Causal reasoning · Causality (physics) · Causation · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Constraint (computer-aided design) · Epistemology · Information processing · Liability · Power (physics) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Jury Decision Making Processes · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Goal-based Explanations of Actions and Outcomes

    John Mcclure•European Review of Social…•2002

  • When People Explain Difficult Actions, is the Causal Question How or Why

    Open Access•John Mcclure, Denis Hilton et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2001

  • Are goals or preconditions better explanations? It depends on the question

    Open Access•John Mcclure, Denis Hilton et al.•European Journal of Social…•1998

  • Is a Cause Conceptualized as a Generative Force

    Open Access•Joel T Johnson, Debra L Long et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2001

Citations per year0.14
Citation span1998 - 2002 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae