The nature of attentional differences between groups of children differentiated by teacher ratings of attention and hyperactivity
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5268568 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John Wilding (0000-0003-2839-8404, Royal Holloway University of London, autor de correspondencia), Fehmidah Munir (0000-0002-5585-0243, University of Nottingham), Kim Cornish (0000-0003-2014-0193, University of Nottingham) |
| Año | 2001 |
| Volumen | 92 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 357-371 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2001-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | British Journal of Psychology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0007-1269 • E-ISSN: 2044-8295 |
| Editorial | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1348/000712601162239 |
| PMID | 11417786 |
| OpenAlex | W2037348081 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
Two groups of children, one with good attention and low hyperactivity and the other with poor attention and high hyperactivity, were formed on the basis of teachers' ratings. The groups were tested on a large number of tests of attentional performance, covering selective attention, divided attention, sustained attention and executive function. Analysis of group differences, with verbal and non-verbal intelligence controlled statistically, indicated that the groups demonstrated significant differences on a variety of measures. Principal components analysis of the tests of attention isolated two components, one of which significantly distinguished the two groups. It is suggested that this component reflected aspects of executive control of attention. The measures which discriminated the groups most clearly were efficiency of visual search involving two targets in alternation, the number of correct responses on a specially devised version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Task and a task measuring the ability to inhibit a dominant response. It is suggested that all these tasks required a combination of selective attention and executive control. It was also noted that the poor attention group produced bigger individual differences on all measures, indicating that this group may include a variety of weaknesses which require more precise analysis to distinguish them
Alternation (linguistics) · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Executive functions · Selective attention · Task (project management) · Visual attention · Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills · Neuroscience · Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,16 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2007 - 2014 (8) |
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |