Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ebonics

The Debate Which Never Happened

Bibliographic Data

ID5282227
AuthorsBarbara M Birch (Westwood College, corresponding author), Barbara Birch
Year1999
Volume22
Issue1
Pages44-55
Publication date1999-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthnic studies review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1555-1881 • E-ISSN: 2576-2915
PublisherUniversity of California Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1525/esr.1999.22.1.44
OpenAlexW2758389280
LanguageEN

The thesis of this paper is that no substantive and impartial debate about the pedagogical value of using Ebonics in the classroom could be held in the United States media because America's prescriptive attitude towards Ebonics does not allow fair and objective consideration of the issue. In presenting this theme I will discuss language ideologies in general and prescription in particular as a common attitude towards language. Prescription with respect to Ebonics usually takes the form of language prejudice. I will conclude with an introduction to one area of language planning, status planning, in which language planners try to improve the status of a dialect or language by selecting a goal, planning the necessary research, and devising a marketing or diffusion plan

Ideology · Linguistics · Plan (archaeology · Political science · Prejudice (legal term · Sociology · Theme (computing · Value (mathematics · Computer Science · History · Law · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Second Language Learning and Teaching

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae