Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Wild Rubber Extraction in the Peruvian Amazon

Local Perception and Socioeconomic Indicators as Tools for Decision-Making

Bibliographic Data

ID5282591
AuthorsLucia Alejandra Fitts (0000-0003-3645-8710), Zoila A Cruz­-Burga (0000-0001-9338-2156), María De Los Ángeles La Torre-Cuadros (0000-0001-9325-3186)
Year2020
Publication date2020-06-17
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthnobiology and Conservation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2238-4782 • E-ISSN: 2238-4782
PublisherUniversidade Estadual da Paraiba/Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (Ethnobiology and Conservation) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.15451/ec2020-06-9.24-1-26
OpenAlexW3036371376
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited2

Forests play an important role in the life of indigenous communities.However, making non timber forest management a profitable economic activity is a difficult task.Factors contributing to this difficulty include the increasing pressure from the market economy, which leads communities to opt for alternative economic activities such as agroforestry, timber harvest, cacao, and aquaculture.External institutions have implemented rubber projects to reintroduce the rubber extraction activity, but the outcomes of these projects are unknown.To help address this issue, our research was conducted in the Sinchi Roca I native community in Peru.The objectives were (1) to describe the process of wild rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) extraction; ( 2) to analyze the local perception by gender of rubber management; and (3) to evaluate the outcomes of this activity using socioeconomic criteria and indicators.Data collection techniques included indepth interviews, focus group discussions, and intrahousehold surveys.First, we found that locals once extracted rubber with unsuitable techniques, which have improved with technical forest management.Second, wild extraction has a positive socioeconomic perception for the community, mainly because it provides income for basic needs.Surveyed families extract around 28,800 liters of rubber per year, averaging US$ 557.80 per family each year.Finally, we found that men and women participate in wild rubber extraction and decision making.However, women prefer not to actively participate in meetings with external institutions.Despite the benefits found, current use of silviculture techniques and community empowerment should be improved to take better advantage of existing potential

Amazon rainforest · Biology · Chromatography · Extraction (chemistry · Geography · Perception · Population · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · Chemistry · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Oil Palm Production and Sustainability · Psychology · Demography · Ecology

  • Secondary forests in Peru

    Open Access•Richard Tito, Norma Salinas et al.•Conservation Ecology•2022

  • Manejo forestal comunitario en América Latina

    Open Access•C Sabogal, Sabogal C et al.•Manejo forestal comunitario en…•2008

  • Challenging Perceptions about Men, Women, and Forest Product Use

    Open Access•Terry Sunderland, Ramadhani Achdiawan et al.•World Development•2014

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae