Historical ethnobotany
An Overview of Selected Studies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5282663 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Taline Cristina Silva, Patrícia Muniz De Medeiros (0000-0002-3835-5232), Patrícia Muniz Medeiros, Alejandro Lozano Balcázar, Thiago Antônio De Sousa Araújo (0000-0002-9392-8734), Analía Pirondo (0000-0002-6214-6983), Maria Franco Trindade Medeiros (0000-0002-0851-8336) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethnobiology and Conservation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2238-4782 • E-ISSN: 2238-4782 |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual da Paraiba/Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (Ethnobiology and Conservation) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.15451/ec2014-6-3.4-1-12 |
| OpenAlex | W1981074798 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 11 |
Historical Ethnobotany is an area of research responsible for understanding past interrelationships between people and plant using written records and iconography. The literature on this topic is scattered, and many of these studies are not recognised as such; therefore, it is difficult to compile historical ethnobotanical data. Accordingly, this study attempted to draw a general picture of the publications in this field. The Scopus, ISI Web of Knowledge and Scirus databases were used to search for articles with such keywords as "Ethnobotany + History" and "Historical Ethnobotany" among others. After the studies were selected, information was extracted that included the continents addressed and historical ages. Most studies encompassed a time frame that began in the Modern Age (54.7%), and 46% of the studies were focused on the American continent. With regard to the nature of the source, 98% of the studies included written records, and publications that used the documental analysis as a secondary data in their scope of research were among the most frequent types of studies that were found. In respect to iconographic sources, paintings were used in 6% of the studies. A total of 66% of the studies involved a species or species group as the study object. Our survey revealed the vast scope of these Historical Ethnobotany studies. We believe that this scientific field has great potential for future development and that its findings will only grow in importance considering the current ethnobotanical debate
Ethnobotany · Field (mathematics · Geography · Medicinal plants · Object (grammar · Scope (computer science · Traditional medicine · Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies · Computer Science · Ethnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies · Medicine · Plant Diversity and Evolution · History
From Cryptozoology to Conservation Biology
The ivy and the palm
The rise of medicalization of plants in Brazil
Medicinal plant uses and names from the herbarium of Francesc Bolòs (1773–1844)
The future is new
Urban Spaces, Plants, and People in the Nineteenth-Century Bogotá, Colombia
Frontiers are Frontlines
A historical overview of ethnobotanical data in Albania (1800s-1940s)
Long hard-sounding Latin name[s]
Female naturalists and the patterns of suppression of women scientists in history
Plants of the USA
Amazonian useful plants described in the book "Le Pays des Amazones" (1885) of the Brazilian propagandist Baron de Santa-Anna Nery
Ethnobiology and Shifting Baselines
Tibetan Medicine Plurality
A relic of medieval folklore
The causal dependence of present plant knowledge on herbals-Contemporary medicinal plant use in Campania (Italy) compared to Matthioli (1568)
Archival data on wild food plants used in Poland in 1948
Extending the temporal context of ethnobotanical databases
Plant identification credibility in ethnobotany
Shadows of the colonial past - diverging plant use in Northern Peru and Southern Ecuador
Changing History in the Lienzos de Guevea and Santo Domingo Petapa
Three Texts in One
The Use and Economic Value of Manna grass (Glyceria) in Poland from the Middle Ages to the Twentieth Century
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,44 |
| Citation span | 2017 - 2025 (9) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |