Does the respondent's role affect the final value of management effectiveness? The case of Brazilian marine protected areas
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5282696 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Camila S Brandão, C S S Brandão, Wesley Da Rocha, Cleverson Zapelini, Jessyca L Teixeira (0000-0003-0749-6371), Alexandre Schiavetti (0000-0001-8429-7646) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethnobiology and Conservation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2238-4782 • E-ISSN: 2238-4782 |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual da Paraiba/Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (Ethnobiology and Conservation) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.15451/ec2020-10-10.06-1-25 |
| OpenAlex | W3092492393 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 41 |
Over the last decade, there has been a change in the way protected areas are managed across the world, as their management gradually ceases to be the sole responsibility of the government and is being shared with civil society. This study evaluates the management effectiveness, according to the managers and management boards of 20 marine protected areas (MPAs) on the coast of Brazil, using the Rapid Assessment and Prioritization of Protected Area Management (RAPPAM) methodology. There were differences in perspectives of the managers and management boards; 8 MPAs showed a significant difference in management effectiveness values, and 11 MPAs showed a change in management effectiveness category. In addition, there was a positive correlation between the year the management board was established, and the effectiveness value provided by the council, as well as a significant difference between the effectiveness values of the MPAs under federal and state responsibility. In view of these differences, it is suggested that evaluations of management effectiveness should be carried out not only with managers, but also with management boards to reduce possible incongruities caused by the responses of only one person
Affect (linguistics · Business · Environmental resource management · Government (linguistics · Management strategy · Marine protected area · Political science · Prioritization · Process management · Respondent · Value (mathematics · Coastal and Marine Management · Computer Science · Coral and Marine Ecosystems Studies · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Environmental Science · Psychology · Ecology · Law
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |