Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Motivation states to move, be physically active and sedentary vary like circadian rhythms and are associated with affect and arousal

Bibliographic Data

ID5284762
AuthorsChristopher J Budnick (0000-0001-6746-6575), Matthew Stults-Kolehmainen, Matthew Stults‐kolehmainen (0000-0001-5361-9614, corresponding author), Cyrus Dadina, John B Bartholomew (0000-0002-3963-0195), Daniel Boullosa (0000-0002-8477-127X), Garret I Ash, Rajita Sinha (0000-0003-3012-4349), Miguel Blacutt (0000-0002-5355-0626), Adrian Haughton, Tom Lu
Year2023
Volume5
Pages1094288-1094288
Publication date2023-04-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Sports and Active Living (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2624-9367 • E-ISSN: 2624-9367
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/fspor.2023.1094288
PMID37143586
OpenAlexW4366290913
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited88

IntroductionMotivation to be physically active and sedentary is a transient state that varies in response to previous behavior. It is not known: (a) if motivational states vary from morning to evening, (b) if they are related to feeling states (arousal/hedonic tone), and (c) whether they predict current behavior and intentions. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if motivation states vary across the day and in what pattern. Thirty adults from the United States were recruited from Amazon MTurk.MethodsParticipants completed 6 identical online surveys each day for 8 days beginning after waking and every 2-3 h thereafter until bedtime. Participants completed: (a) the CRAVE scale (Right now version) to measure motivation states for Move and Rest, (b) Feeling Scale, (c) Felt Arousal Scale, and (d) surveys about current movement behavior (e.g., currently sitting, standing, laying down) and intentions for exercise and sleep. Of these, 21 participants (mean age 37.7 y; 52.4% female) had complete and valid data.ResultsVisual inspection of data determined that: a) motivation states varied widely across the day, and b) most participants had a single wave cycle each day. Hierarchical linear modelling revealed that there were significant linear and quadratic time trends for both Move and Rest. Move peaked near 1500 h when Rest was at its nadir. Cosinor analysis determined that the functional waveform was circadian for Move for 81% of participants and 62% for Rest. Pleasure/displeasure and arousal independently predicted motivation states (all p's < .001), but arousal had an association twice as large. Eating, exercise and sleep behaviors, especially those over 2 h before assessment, predicted current motivation states. Move-motivation predicted current body position (e.g., laying down, sitting, walking) and intentions for exercise and sleep more consistently than rest, with the strongest prediction of behaviors planned for the next 30 min.DiscussionWhile these data must be replicated with a larger sample, results suggest that motivation states to be active or sedentary have a circadian waveform for most people and influence future behavioral intentions. These novel results highlight the need to rethink the traditional approaches typically utilized to increase physical activity levels

Affect (linguistics · Arousal · Developmental psychology · Evening · Feeling · Morning · Physical therapy · Pleasure · Rhythm · Sitting · Visual analogue scale · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Eating Disorders and Behaviors · Medicine · Physical Activity and Health · Psychology · Communication · Social Psychology

  • The CRAVE scale to measure motivational states for physical activity and sedentary behavior

    Open Access•Hadi Samadieh, Farhad Tanhaye Reshvanloo et al.•Current Psychology•2025

  • Reliability of the Feeling Scale and Felt Arousal Scale in Older Adults

    Open Access•Victor Grillo Sobrinho, Walace Monteiro et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Qualitative and quantitative evidence of motivation states for physical activity, exercise and being sedentary from university student focus groups

    Open Access•Matthew A Stults-Kolehmainen, Matthew Stults‐kolehmainen et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2023

  • Imaginary Relish and Exquisite Torture

    Denis J Kavanagh, Jackie Andrade et al.•Psychological Review•2005

  • Emotion, cognitive structure, and action tendency

    Nico H Frijda•Cognition & Emotion•1987

  • Not What, but How One Feels

    Charles J Hardy, W Jack Rejeski•Journal of Sport and Exercise…•1989

  • Affective–Reflective Theory of physical inactivity and exercise

    Open Access•Ralf Brand, Panteleimon Ekkekakis•German Journal of Exercise and…•2018

  • Acute affective response to a moderate-intensity exercise stimulus predicts physical activity participation 6 and 12 months later

    Open Access•David M Williams, Shira I Dunsiger et al.•Psychology of Sport and Exercise•2008

  • Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited

    Open Access•Michael Inzlicht, Brandon J Schmeichel et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2014

  • The Effect of Small Sample Size on Two-Level Model Estimates

    Open Access•Daniel M McNeish, Daniel McNeish et al.•Educational Psychology Review•2016

  • Predictors of Multitasking with Media

    Seon Hye Jeong, Se-Hoon Jeong et al.•Media Psychology•2007

  • Out of Control

    Open Access•G Loewenstein•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1996

  • The Effects of Stress on Physical Activity and Exercise

    Open Access•Matthew A Stults-Kolehmainen, Matthew Stults‐kolehmainen et al.•Sports Medicine•2014

  • The Intensity of Motivation

    Jack W Brehm, Elizabeth A Self•Annual Review of Psychology•1989

  • The behaviour change wheel

    Open Access•Susan Michie, Maartje M Van Stralen et al.•Implementation Science•2011

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Hierarchical linear models

    Anthony S Bryk, Stephen W Raudenbush•Hierarchical linear models•2002

  • Reporting Practice in Multilevel Modeling

    Open Access•Wen Luo, Haoran Li et al.•Review of Educational Research•2021

  • Estimation of Random Coefficient Multilevel Models in the Context of Small Numbers of Level 2 Clusters

    Open Access•Jocelyn H Bolin, W Holmes Finch et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2019

  • An Introduction to Multilevel Modeling for Social and Personality Psychology

    Open Access•John B Nezlek•Social and Personality Psychology…•2008

  • Distraction, the desire to eat and food intake. Towards an expanded model of mindless eating

    Jane Ogden, Nicola Coop et al.•Appetite•2013

  • Embracing Chaos and Complexity

    K Resnicow, Sarah E Page et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2008

  • On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance

    Andrew J Elliot, Patricia G Devine•Journal of Personality and Social…•1994

  • Metamotivational dominance

    Sven Svebak, Stephen Murgatroyd•Journal of Personality and Social…•1985

  • Affect Grid

    James A Russell, Anna Wei et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • Qualitative and quantitative evidence of motivation states for physical activity, exercise and being sedentary from university student focus groups

    Open Access•Matthew A Stults-Kolehmainen, Matthew Stults‐kolehmainen et al.•Frontiers in Sports and Active…•2023

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae