Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perceptions and imaginaries about the fourth industrial revolution between geographies of opportunity and discontent

Some reflections on the Italian case

Bibliographic Data

ID5286256
AuthorsMichela Lazzeroni (0000-0002-7919-2775, Department of Civilizations and Forms of Knowledge University of Pisa Pisa Italy, corresponding author), Valentina Erminia Albanese (0000-0002-1654-7321, Department of Law, Economics and Cultures University of Insubria Como Italy)
Year2023
Volume189
Issue2
Pages342-356
Publication date2023-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeographical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7398 • E-ISSN: 1475-4959
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/geoj.12491
OpenAlexW4307137411
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited47

The pervasiveness of advanced technologies and their disruptive impact on society have spurred the debate on the emergence of a new industrial revolution and on its positive and negative effects, both at an individual and spatial level. This paper aims to contribute to this debate, focusing attention on the perception of changes related to the Fourth Industrial Revolution and exploring new methods of analysis of the manifestations of both techno-enthusiasm and opposition to it. Starting from the extensive literature in this field, the work adopts two research perspectives: the study of imaginaries and narratives developed around the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which convey different messages from social groups and places; the geographies of opportunity and discontent, which address the resentment expressed by some localities towards advanced technological models and growing inequalities. In this work the Fourth Industrial Revolution is not interpreted through data about the technological variables or interviews to protagonists of the phenomenon; rather, emphasis is on the points of view of non-institutional subjects and, in particular, the opinions expressed by people on the Web. For this reason, the sentiment analysis has been adopted to identify both positive and negative polarities and the relevance of specific feelings through the selection of key words related to the notion of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The empirical analysis based on this methodology focuses on the Italian case in a specific period (first and second phase of the pandemic, from January 2020 to September 2021) and, at a local level, on the comparison between four medium-sized cities (Pisa, Lecce, Taranto and Terni). This paper also tries to extend recent contributions through the provision of new perspectives for the definition of policies designed with the involvement of the population and places regarding both the processes of technological change and the definition of new socio-spatial models

Economics · Economy · Enthusiasm · Epistemology · Feeling · Industrial Revolution · Narrative · Perception · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Resentment · Social science · Sociology · Technological revolution · Law · Psychology · Regional resilience and development · Smart Cities and Technologies · Social Psychology

  • Performing the future of work

    Open Access•Tim Blackman•Geoforum•2025

  • Artificial Intelligence and New Visions of the Future of the City

    Open Access•Michela Lazzeroni, Antonello Romano•Journal of Urban Technology•2025

  • Soft skills and the use of industry 4.0 as determinants of professional development in engineering graduates

    Open Access•Reyes Palá Laguna, Danny Alonso Lizarzaburu Aguinaga et al.•Sustainable Futures•2025

  • Binaries again! Revisiting the urban-rural question through geographies of discontent

    Open Access•Güldem Özataǧan, Ayda Eraydin•Habitat International•2024

  • Exploring the formal development of regional policies and their potential to drive local change

    Open Access•Alessandra Colocci, Antonella Pietta et al.•Geographical Journal•2025

  • Platform Urbanism

    Open Access•Sarah Barn, Sarah Barns•Platform Urbanism•2020

  • Regional income disparities, monopoly and finance

    Open Access•Mitchell Feldman, Maryann Feldman et al.•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2021

  • The platformization of tourism

    Open Access•Cristina Capineri, Antonello Romano•Digital Geography and Society•2021

  • Geographies of the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Reuben Rose-Redwood, Rob Kitchin et al.•Dialogues in Human Geography•2020

  • The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it)

    Andrés Rodríguez-Pose•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2017

  • Where do angry birds tweet? Income inequality and online hate in Italy

    Open Access•Daria Denti, Alessandra Faggian•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2021

  • When machines think for us

    Open Access•Judith Clifton, Amy Glasmeier et al.•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2020

  • Of losers and laggards

    Open Access•Jorge Díaz Lanchas, Aleksandra Sojka et al.•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2021

  • Making sense of smart cities

    Rob Kitchin•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2014

  • Regional inequality in Europe

    Open Access•Simona Iammarino, Andrés Rodríguez-Pose et al.•Journal of Economic Geography•2018

  • Civil liberties or public health, or civil liberties and public health? Using surveillance technologies to tackle the spread of Covid-19

    Rob Kitchin•Space and Polity•2020

  • A systematic literature review on opinion types and sentiment analysis techniques

    Open Access•Atika Qazi, Ram Gopal Raj et al.•Internet Research•2017

  • High-Tech Activities, System Innovativeness and Geographical Concentration

    Open Access•Michela Lazzeroni•European Urban and Regional Studies•2010

  • Capturing and mapping quality of life using Twitter data

    Open Access•Slavica Zivanovic, J Alfredo Martínez et al.•GeoJournal•2018

  • The dark side of the geography of innovation

    Open Access•Flávio L Pinheiro, Pierre-Alexandre Balland et al.•Regional Studies•2022

  • The geography of Industry 4.0 technologies across European regions

    Claudia Corradini, Carlo Corradini et al.•Regional Studies•2021

  • Perceptions of regional inequality and the geography of discontent

    Open Access•Phillip Mccann•Regional Studies•2019

  • Mapping the potentials of regions in Europe to contribute to new knowledge production in Industry 4.0 technologies

    Open Access•Pierre-Alexandre Balland, Ron Boschma•Regional Studies•2021

  • Varieties of smart urbanism in the UK

    Open Access•Federico Caprotti, Roger Cowley•Transactions of the Institute of…•2019

  • Curating digital geographies in an era of data colonialism

    Open Access•Alistair Fraser•Geoforum•2019

  • The Age of Surveillance Capitalism

    Shoshana Zuboff•The Age of Surveillance Capitalism•2019

  • The geography of EU discontent

    Open Access•Lewis Dijkstra, Hugo Poelman et al.•Regional Studies•2019

  • Smartmentality

    Open Access•Alberto Vanolo•Urban Studies•2013

  • Provenance, power and place

    Open Access•Harry Ford, Heather Ford et al.•Environment and Planning D…•2016

Unique citing works5
Citations per year2,5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae