Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Family Hubs and the vulnerable care ecologies of child and family welfare in austerity

Bibliographic Data

ID5286435
AuthorsTom Disney (0000-0002-6080-7709, Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK, corresponding author), Steve Crossley (Department of Sociology Durham University Durham UK), Hannah King (0000-0002-5066-5815, Department of Sociology Durham University Durham UK), Josie Phillips (Department of Sociology Durham University Durham UK), Ian Robson (0000-0003-3477-8710, Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK), Roger Smith (0000-0003-4720-0280, Department of Sociology Durham University Durham UK)
Year2025
Volume191
Issue3
Publication date2025-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGeographical Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-7398 • E-ISSN: 1475-4959
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/geoj.12505
OpenAlexW4312180118
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited38

This article takes an ecological approach to examine the legacies of austerity for local authority welfare systems in England and the implications for families seeking to use these services. Programmes of Early Intervention or Early Help that promote 'resilience' amongst marginalised families and reduce future dependency upon state services have been advocated consistently in the UK, currently intensifying with a period of welfare retrenchment and restructuring. Many programmes and approaches being promoted prioritise a discourse of individual or familial responsibility and seek to deflect attention away from structural and environmental changes that have taken place. We explore local authority family and child support services as relational care practices that have been fundamentally reshaped through austerity, and in doing so we seek to shift the conversation from individual responsibility to systemic and collective vulnerabilities. Drawing on the concept of 'care ecology' to conceptualise local authority Early Help services as 'carescapes', we focus specifically on the changing context of 'Family Hubs', and the fragmented nature of service provision. As with any ecosystem, care ecologies are constituted by interconnected and interdependent actors, processes and systems. Damage to them produces unintended consequences which exacerbate underlying 'vulnerabilities'. We explore this as a legacy of austerity, noting that this has resulted in forms of socio-spatial distancing from care provision for families, disrupting protective networks and support systems. We argue that local authority support services would be better focused on systemic and collective vulnerabilities rather than individual responsibilities in order to provide meaningful support to families

Agency (philosophy · Austerity · Economic growth · Economics · Ecosystem services · Interdependence · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Restructuring · Social science · Sociology · Unintended consequences · Welfare · Ecology · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Social Work Education and Practice

  • Caring with

    Open Access•Tess Osborne, Thomas A Lowe et al.•Wellbeing Space and Society•2025

  • What Reproductive Justice Brings to and Requires of The Feminist Economics Project

    Open Access•Contributors: Contributors, Wendy Sigle et al.•Feminist Economics•2025

  • Austerity as reproductive injustice

    Open Access•Laura Sochas, Jenny Chanfreau•Social Forces•2025

  • Child protection and family support

    Open Access•Thomas El‐ho, F Thomas et al.•Geoforum•2024

  • Housing and children’s social care in England

    Open Access•Thomas El‐ho, F Thomas et al.•Housing Studies•2024

  • The Accidental Hub

    Open Access•Emma Maynard, Billie Lever Taylor et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2025

  • Austere futures

    Open Access•Julie Macleavy•Geographical Journal•2025

  • Legacies of Austerity

    Open Access•Sander Van Lanen, Suzanne M Hall•Geographical Journal•2025

  • Circles of care

    Emily K Abel, Margaret K Nelson•Circles of care•1990

  • Small acts, kind words and “not too much fuss”

    Open Access•John Horton, P Kraftl•Emotion, space and society•2009

  • Offline

    Open Access•Robin Horton, Richard Horton•The Lancet•2020

  • Social policy 3e

    Paul Spicker•Social Policy 3e•2014

  • Living and Feeling the Austere

    Esther Hitchen•New Formations•2016

  • Between “Families in Trouble” and “Children at Risk”

    Open Access•Michael Lambert•Children & Society•2019

  • Let’s stop feeding the risk monster

    Brid Featherstone, Anna Gupta et al.•Families Relationships and…•2016

  • Emotions, affect and social policy

    Open Access•Eleanor Jupp•Critical Policy Studies•2021

  • Early help and children’s services

    Open Access•Steven Lucas, Philip John Archard•Journal of Children s Services•2021

  • Retrenched, Reconfigured and Broken

    Open Access•Kevin Farnsworth•Social Policy and Society•2020

  • The Legacy of Austerity

    Open Access•Zoë Irving•Social Policy and Society•2020

  • Unpacking ‘family troubles’, care and relationality across time and space

    Ruth Evans, Sophia Bowlby et al.•Children s Geographies•2019

  • Enacting parenting policy? The hybrid spaces of Sure Start Children's Centres

    Eleanor Jupp•Children s Geographies•2013

  • Facilitating access to services for children and families

    Open Access•Claudia Garbers, Jane Tunstill et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2006

  • Living austerity urbanism

    Sander Van Lanen•Urban Geography•2017

  • From Sure Start to Children’s Centres

    Carl Bagley•Journal of Education Policy•2011

  • Participatory action research

    Franziska Baum, Christiana Macdougall et al.•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2006

  • Distancing and limited resourcefulness

    Open Access•John Clayton, Catherine Donovan et al.•Urban Studies•2016

  • Anticipating service withdrawal

    Open Access•John Horton•Transactions of the Institute of…•2016

  • Stasis disguised as motion

    Open Access•Elizabeth Kiely•Transactions of the Institute of…•2021

  • The right to be weary? Endurance and exhaustion in austere times

    Open Access•E Wilkinson, Iliana Ortega-Alcázar et al.•Transactions of the Institute of…•2018

  • Coping with the Cuts? The Management of the Worst Financial Settlement in Living Memory

    Annette Hastings, Nicholas Bailey et al.•Local Government Studies•2015

  • Landscapes of care

    Open Access•Christine Milligan, Janine Wiles•Progress in Human Geography•2010

  • Towards geographies of child protection

    Open Access•Tom Disney, Julian Lloyd et al.•Geography Compass•2020

  • Cities of care

    Open Access•Emma R Power, M J Williams•Geography Compass•2020

  • Recognising the Time-Space Dimensions of Care

    Open Access•Sophia Bowlby, Sophie Bowlby•Environment and Planning A…•2012

  • Spaces of care in the city

    David Conradson•Social & Cultural Geography•2003

  • Responsibility, resilience and symbolic power

    Open Access•Hannah King, Stephen Crossley et al.•The Sociological Review•2021

  • Disability, Oppression and Violence

    Open Access•Andrea Hollomotz•Sociology•2013

Unique citing works8
Citations per year4
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae