US Central Command and liberal imperial reach
Shaping the Central Region for the 21st Century
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5290384 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Morrissey (0000-0002-4986-776X, School of Geography and Archaeology National University of Ireland, Galway University Road Galway Ireland, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 182 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 15-26 |
| Publication date | 2016-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Geographical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-7398 • E-ISSN: 1475-4959 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/geoj.12118 |
| OpenAlex | W1518708209 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 42 |
For over 30 years, the grand strategy of one of the most important commands in theUSmilitary, Central Command (CENTCOM), has consistently held fast to a commitment to neoliberal capitalism and an ostensibly free-market global economy. Any accrued national or global economic benefits are impossible to chart, of course, and soCENTCOM's securitization discourse relies upon vaguer, yet promissory logics about 'keeping the global economy open'. My aim in this paper is to show how the story ofCENTCOM's mission is crucial to understanding howUSmilitary interventionism works today through a discursive geoeconomic imagination that is vague yet persuasive in its universalist dimensions. In a period marked by globalisation and new forms of capitalist accumulation,CENTCOM's mission has nevertheless habitually involved fashioning itself in a neoliberal 'world policeman' role, and to that end has employed a strategy that can be best described as one of 'geoeconomic deterrence'. The paper outlines the entwined military and economic security logics of this strategy, which have resulted in the Middle East and CentralAsia being repeatedly conditioned as requiring forms of corrective military interventionism. Since its establishment in 1983,CENTCOM's strategy papers, mission statements and annual reports to Congress have collectively scripted practices of intervention and deterrence that rely upon dominant registers of military and economic risk. In critically consideringCENTCOM's mission, the paper shows how the command's initiation fundamentally changedUSforeign policy by solidifying theCarter Doctrine and subsequently committing to the geoeconomic shaping of the most energy-rich region on earth
Capitalism · Deterrence theory · Doctrine · Economics · Economy · Geopolitics · Globalization · Hegemony · International relations · Interventionism (politics · Military doctrine · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Global Security and Public Health · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
An Empire of Indifference
The Endgame of Globalization
Uneven Development
Geopolitics and Empire
Resource Wars
Introduction to Geopolitics
End of Dreams, Return of History
The New Imperialism
Geopolitical Regression and The American Empire
Sovereign Power and the Biopolitics of Human Security
Balancing visions
A Strategy for the Rapid Deployment Force
Soviet Vulnerabilities in Iran and the RDF Deterrent
Geoeconomics in the Long War
Closing the Neoliberal Gap
The Colonial Present
The Rapid Deployment Force and U.S. Military Intervention in the Persian Gulf
Soviet Policy in the Arc of Crisis
Guardians of the Gulf
Geopolitics and Empire
American Empire
A Geography of Logistics
Geoeconomic Imaginations and Economic Geography in the Early Twentieth Century
Critical geopolitics
Is a critical geopolitics possible? Foucault, class and the vision thing
Dis/placing the geo-politics which one cannot not want
The Birth of Biopolitics
Feminist Geopolitics Revisited
A Feminist Geopolitics
Security, Territory, Population
Geopolitical Fears, Geoeconomic Hopes, and the Responsibilities of Geography
After Geopolitics? From the Geopolitical Social to Geoeconomics
Recontextualising violence, power and nature
Critical Geopolitics
Power and principle
The Geopolitical economy of 'resource wars
Regions, Strategies and Empire in the Global War on Terror
Liberal Lawfare and Biopolitics
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,18 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2020 (6) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |