Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

From Storytelling to Facebook

Content Biases When Retelling or Sharing a Story

Bibliographic Data

ID5293699
AuthorsA Acerbi (0000-0001-5827-8003, Brunel University of London, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume33
Issue2
Pages132-144
Publication date2022-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Nature (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1045-6767 • E-ISSN: 1936-4776
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s12110-022-09423-1
PMID35488999
OpenAlexW4225117369
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited42

Cultural evolution researchers use transmission chain experiments to investigate which content is more likely to survive when transmitted from one individual to another. These experiments resemble oral storytelling, wherein individuals need to understand, memorize, and reproduce the content. However, prominent contemporary forms of cultural transmission-think an online sharing-only involve the willingness to transmit the content. Here I present two fully preregistered online experiments that explicitly investigated the differences between these two modalities of transmission. The first experiment (N = 1,080 participants) examined whether negative content, information eliciting disgust, and threat-related information were better transmitted than their neutral counterpart in a traditional transmission chain setup. The second experiment (N = 1,200 participants) used the same material, but participants were asked whether or not they would share the content in two conditions: in a large anonymous social network or with their friends, in their favorite social network. Negative content was both better transmitted in transmission chain experiments and shared more than its neutral counterpart. Threat-related information was successful in transmission chain experiments but not when sharing, and finally, information eliciting disgust was not advantaged in either. Overall, the results present a composite picture, suggesting that the interactions between the specific content and the medium of transmission are important and, possibly, that content biases are stronger when memorization and reproduction are involved in the transmission-as in oral transmission-than when they are not-as in online sharing. Negative content seems to be reliably favored in both modalities of transmission

Anger · Cognitive psychology · Content (measure theory · Cultural transmission in animals · Disgust · Internet privacy · Memorization · Narrative · Storytelling · Telecommunications · Transmission (telecommunications · Computer Science · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology · Genetics

  • Content biases in three phases of cultural transmission

    Open Access•J M Stubbersfield•Culture and Evolution•2022

  • Mapping technological futures

    Open Access•Maciej Skórski, Alina Landowska et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Negative news headlines are more attractive

    Open Access•Mei Zhang, Hao Wu et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • A cultural evolution theory for contemporary polarization trends in moral opinions

    Open Access•Kimmo Eriksson, Irina Vartanova et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Negativity bias in the spread of voter fraud conspiracy theory tweets during the 2020 US election

    Mason Youngblood, J M Stubbersfield et al.•2021

  • Negativity bias in the spread of voter fraud conspiracy theory tweets during the 2020 US election

    Open Access•Mason Youngblood, J M Stubbersfield et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • Feeling Unwanted

    Open Access•Helton Levy, Jennifer Harding•Sociological Research Online•2026

  • Conspiracy Theories and Anxiety in Culture

    Open Access•Martin Palecek, Václav Hampel•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2024

  • Universal cognitive mechanisms explain the cultural success of bloodletting

    Open Access•Helena Miton, Nicolas Claidière et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2015

  • Origins of sinister rumors

    Open Access•Timothy Blaine, P Boyer•Evolution and Human Behavior•2018

  • The multiple roles of cultural transmission experiments in understanding human cultural evolution

    Open Access•Alex Mesoudi, A Whiten•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2008

  • The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity

    Open Access•Dan Sperber, Lawrence A Hirschfeld•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2004

  • Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour

    Open Access•Valerie Curtis, Mícheál De Barra et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2011

  • Self-reported willingness to share political news articles in online surveys correlates with actual sharing on Twitter

    Open Access•Mohsen Mosleh, Gordon Pennycook et al.•PLoS ONE•2020

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • The Social News Gap

    Open Access•J Bright•Journal of Communication•2016

  • Cognitive Evolution and the Transmission of Popular Narratives

    Open Access•J M Stubbersfield, Emma Flynn et al.•Evolutionary Studies in…•2017

  • Internet users engage more with phatic posts than with health misinformation on Facebook

    Open Access•Manon Berriche, Sacha Altay•Palgrave Communications•2020

  • Four misunderstandings about cultural attraction

    Open Access•Thom Scott‐phillip, Stefaan Blancke et al.•Evolutionary Anthropology Issues…•2018

  • Corpses, Maggots, Poodles and Rats

    Kimmo Eriksson, Julie C Coultas•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2014

  • Cultural Attraction in Film Evolution

    Oleg Sobchuk, Peeter Tinits•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2020

  • Individual Choose-to-Transmit Decisions Reveal Little Preference for Transmitting Negative or High-Arousal Content

    Florian Van Leeuwen, Nora Parren et al.•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2018

  • Chicken Tumours and a Fishy Revenge

    J M Stubbersfield, Jamshid J Tehrani et al.•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2017

  • Why do so few people share fake news? It hurts their reputation

    Open Access•Sacha Altay, Anne-Sophie Hacquin et al.•New Media & Society•2020

  • On the Genealogy of Norms

    Open Access•Shaun Nichol•Philosophy of Science•2002

  • The sky is falling

    Open Access•Keely Bebbington, Colin Macleod et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2016

  • Emotional selection in memes

    Chip Heath, Chris Bell et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • Cultural evolution of emotional expression in 50 years of song lyrics

    Open Access•Charlotte O Brand, A Acerbi et al.•Evolutionary Human Sciences•2019

  • Bad is Stronger than Good

    Open Access•Roy F Baumeister, Ellen Bratslavsky et al.•Review of General Psychology•2001

  • A bias for social information in human cultural transmission

    Open Access•Alex Mesoudi, A Whiten et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2006

  • Serial killers, spiders and cybersex

    Open Access•J M Stubbersfield, Jamshid J Tehrani et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2015

  • Partisan Polarization Is the Primary Psychological Motivation behind Political Fake News Sharing on Twitter

    Open Access•Mathias Osmundsen, Alexander Bor et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

Unique citing works8
Citations per year1,6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae