I have seen a face with a thousand countenances
Interpreting Ptolemies' mixed statuary
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5330171 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Catarina Miranda (0000-0002-7945-8297, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Issue | 33 |
| Pages | 3-14 |
| Publication date | 2019-12-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0103-9709 • E-ISSN: 2448-1750 |
| Publisher | Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.11606/issn.2448-1750.revmae.2019.169503 |
| OpenAlex | W3085229569 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
Around the time the postcolonial paradigm was establishing in the Humanities, so too was the Ptolemaic period receiving growing attention. Scholars studying this chronology, during the second half of the twentieth century, however, understood Egypt's society and culture as a set of impermeable communities/ traditions, only coexisting with one another. This interpretation caused a radical turn in the historiography of the topic. More significantly, though, it left material culture that did not belong exclusively to neither one of the cultural sets (Greek or Egyptian) largely overlooked, and, later on, underestimated in the debates on who influenced who. The author's Master dissertation took as a case study the Greco-Egyptian stone sculpture in the round of the male Ptolemaic rulers, looking to further understand the epreviously underestimated objects. They were not underestimated, however, in the sense that their existence was not acknowledged or analysed, but in the sense that the explanation put forward was not complex enough. The authors formulated their interpretation mainly from the point of view of state and elites, disconsidering thus other possible realms of agency. This article presents a part of the investigation, namely the theoretical framework adopted to suggest another interpretation for the existence of the "mixed" statuary of Ptolemaic rulers. Although today Ptolemaic Egypt is not understood as a colonial case, postcolonial studies will contribute to this alternative line of interpretation by decentralizing analysis, from the state to other groups. Nevertheless, the major contribution will come from a theory of consumption, which in turn aims to decentralize studies, from issues of power to other realms
Aesthetics · Agency (philosophy) · Archaeology · Art · Colonialism · Epistemology · Face (sociological concept) · Historiography · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Literature · Sculpture · Social science · Sociology · State (computer science) · African history and culture analysis · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · History · Islamic Studies and History · Philosophy
The Hellenistic Age from the Battle of Ipsos to the Death of Kleopatra VII
The Oxford Handbook of Material Culture Studies
Villages, land and population in Graeco-Roman Egypt
The Hellenistic Family
Demand Creation, Consumption, and Power in Ptolemaic Egypt
The Politics of Knowledge
The Hellenistic Age from the Battle of Ipsos to the Death of Kleopatra VII
The Shifting Sands of History
The Shifting Sands of History
Colonialism and Migration in the Ancient Mediterranean
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |