Cross-cultural validation of ImpRes-Tool-BR

A Tool for Project Development and Implementation Research

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5335014
AutoresCarlos Alberto Dos Santos Treichel (0000-0002-0440-9108, Universidade de São Paulo, autor de correspondencia), Leidy Janeth Erazo-Chavez (0000-0003-3715-7864, Universidade Federal do Maranhão), Nick Sevdalis (0000-0001-7560-8924, King’s College de Londres, Inglaterra), Ioannis Bakolis (0000-0002-4800-1630, King’s College de Londres, Inglaterra), Louise Mary Hull (0000-0003-4660-4005, King’s College de Londres, Inglaterra), Rosana Teresa Onocko-Campos (0000-0003-0469-5447, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP))
Año2024
Volumen48
Número141
Fecha de publicación2024-06-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSaúde em Debate (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0103-1104 • E-ISSN: 2358-2898
EditorialFapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1590/2358-289820241418550i
OpenAlexW4400475579
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas15

This study aims to present the results of the translation, cross-cultural validation and preliminary evaluation of a tool, originally developed in the United Kingdom, to guide Brazilian researchers in the elaboration of projects and rigorous and high-quality implementation research: ImpRes-BR. Following currently established good practices for cross-cultural validation of instruments and scales, the tool, together with its user guide, was translated and back-translated, subjected to a pilot test with 20 health professionals and evaluated by a panel of 10 specialists who assigned the values used for the calculations of the Content Validity Index at the item level (CVI-I) and scale (CVI-E). In this process, in addition to conceptual validity indices greater than 90%, an IVC-I of at least 0.90 was observed in all domains of the tool and its guide, and an IVC-E of 0.98. Having established the validity of the tool and its guide, it was applied in 14 research projects in the planning or execution phase and was recognized as a powerful instrument for self-analysis of the teams in the qualification of their projects and strengthening them in relation to the principles of the Implementation Science

Computer Science · Delphi Technique in Research · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Health Policy Implementation Science