Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deficits, Expectations and Paradigms in British and American Drug Safety Assessments

Prising Open the Black Box of Regulatory Science

Bibliographic Data

ID5336986
AuthorsJohn Abraham (0000-0003-3643-0128, University of Sussex), Julian Abraham (0000-0003-0643-0274, University of Sussex, J.W.Abraham@ sussex.ac.uk), Courtney Davis (0000-0002-9425-9886, University of Sussex)
Year2007
Volume32
Issue4
Pages399-431
Publication date2007-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243907301002
OpenAlexW2118920134
LanguageEN
Citations received23
References cited34

This article examines the regulation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), with particular focus on products approved for marketing in the United Kingdom, while denied marketing approval in the United States on safety grounds, and then subsequently withdrawn from the UK market on those grounds. Using international comparison of regulatory data never before accessed outside government and companies, together with interviews with relevant industry scientists and regulators, the article demonstrates the importance of regulatory expectations, deficits and paradigms. It is argued both that these sociological concepts can be enriched by their application to detailed comparative case study of regulatory science, and that they provide an important policy-relevant framework with which to understand discrepant drug regulatory processes in a sociohistorical context. It is found that regulatory expectations and paradigms may be regarded as mediating factors between political culture and structural interests, on the one hand, and the outcomes of regulatory science (including deficits), on the other

Government regulation · Nonsteroidal · Pharmaceutical industry · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Regulatory science · Sociology · Historical Medical Research and Treatments · Law · Medicine · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions · Pharmacology

  • Nouvelle économie du développement et essais cliniques randomisés

    Open Access•Agnès Labrousse•Revue de la régulation•2010

  • Disease classification

    Open Access•Sarah Wadmann•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2023

  • Traversing Technology Trajectories

    Open Access•Frederick C Klaessig•NanoEthics•2021

  • Medical Innovations

    Open Access•Stuart Blume•Sociology Compass•2013

  • Taming uncertainty

    Gerard de Vries, Imrat Verhoeven et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2011

  • Regulatory experiments and transnational networks

    Stuart Hogarth•Innovation The European Journal…•2012

  • Cardiac stem cell research

    Dana Wilson-Kovacs, Christine Hauskeller•Innovation The European Journal…•2012

  • Hope and Fear in Biotechnology

    Open Access•R Shields•Space and Culture•2008

  • The “Revolving Door” between Regulatory Agencies and Industry

    Open Access•Zahra Meghani, Jennifer Kuzma•Journal of Agricultural and…•2010

  • Sociology of pharmaceuticals development and regulation

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham•Sociology of Health & Illness•2008

  • From Regulatory Knowledge to Regulatory Decisions

    Open Access•Boris Hauray•Minerva•2017

  • On the prohibition of conflicts of interest in pharmaceutical regulation

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  • The FDA’s standard-making process for medical digital health technologies

    Open Access•Elisa Lievevrouw, Luisa Marelli et al.•BioSocieties•2022

  • Evolving sociological analyses of ‘pharmaceuticalisation’

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham•Sociology of Health & Illness•2011

  • Emergence of a techno-legal specialty

    Open Access•Anne-Marie Coles•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2021

  • The ratio of vision to data

    Open Access•Stuart Hogarth, Paul Martins•Regulation & Governance•2021

  • Regulatory Toxicology in Controversy

    Open Access•David Demortain•Science Technology & Human Values•2013

  • "Medical Cannabis" as a Contested Medicine

    Open Access•Dana Zarhin, Maya Negev et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2020

  • The Neoliberal Regulatory State, Industry Interests, and the Ideological Penetration of Scientific Knowledge

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2012

  • Ethical Reflection Must Always be Measured

    Open Access•Kathrin Braun, Svea Luise Herrmann et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2010

  • Multidisciplinary perspectives on the regulation of diagnostic technologies

    Open Access•Stuart Hogarth, Fiona A Miller et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • Pharmaceuticalization of Society in Context

    Open Access•John Abraham•Sociology•2010

  • Desperately seeking cancer drugs

    Open Access•Courtney Davis, John Abraham•Sociology of Health & Illness•2011

  • Science, politics, and the pharmaceutical industry

    John Abraham•Science, politics, and the…•1995

  • Designs on Nature

    Sheila Jasanoff•Designs on Nature•2005

  • The structure of scientific revolutions

    Dennis Holland, Thomas S Kuhn•La Structure des révolutions…•1976

  • New Medical Technologies and Society - Reordering Life

    Open Access•Barbara Prainsack•Science & Technology Studies•2004

  • Trading risks for markets

    John Abraham, Julian Abraham et al.•Health Risk & Society•2001

  • A Tale of Two Experts

    Arthur Daemmrich•Social History of Medicine•2002

  • Risk Versus Risk

    Arthur Daemmrich, Georg Krücken•Science as Culture•2000

  • Progress, Innovation and Regulatory Science in Drug Development

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham et al.•Social Studies of Science•2002

  • Scientific Standards and Institutional Interests

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham•Social Studies of Science•1993

  • Carcinogenic Risk Assessment in the United States and Great Britain

    Open Access•Brendan Gillespie, Dave Eva et al.•Social Studies of Science•1979

  • "Revisiting "the origins of compulsory drug prescriptions

    Harry M Marks•American Journal of Public Health•1995

  • Citizenship, Medical Expertise and the Capitalist Regulatory State in Europe

    Open Access•John Abraham, GRAHAM LEWIS•Sociology•2002

  • Untangling Context

    Open Access•Daniel Lee Kleinman•Science Technology & Human Values•1998

  • Comparative Risk Assessment

    Open Access•Ralph M Perhac•Science Technology & Human Values•1998

  • Accommodating Science to External Demands

    Open Access•Peter Groenewegen•Science Technology & Human Values•2002

  • Affiliation Bias and Expert Disagreement in Framing the Nicotine Addiction Debate

    Open Access•Priscilla Murphy•Science Technology & Human Values•2001

  • Beyond Skeptical Relativism

    Open Access•Patrick Van Zwanenberg, Erik Millstone•Science Technology & Human Values•2000

  • Democracy, Technocracy, and the Secret State of Medicines Control

    Open Access•John Abraham, Julian Abraham et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•1997

  • Not just a statistic

    Open Access•Lara V Marks, Lara Marks•Social Science & Medicine•1999

Unique citing works23
Citations per year1,28
Citation span2008 - 2023 (16)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 23

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae