Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science
Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5337002 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leonie Dendler (0000-0003-4442-5273, Department Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany, corresponding author), Gaby-Fleur Böl (Department Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany), Gaby‐Fleur Böl (Federal Institute for Risk Assessment) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 719-754 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243920944499 |
| OpenAlex | W3048130121 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 51 |
While the demands for greater engagement in science in general and regulatory science in particular have been steadily increasing, we still face limited understanding of the empirical resonance of these demands. Against this context, this paper presents findings from a recent study of a potential participatory opening of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment ("Bundesinstitut für Riskobewertung" [BfR]), a prominent regulatory scientific organization in the field of risk governance. Drawing upon quantitative surveys of the public and selected professional experts as well as in-depth qualitative expert interviews, we identify a general support for greater engagement in science-based risk assessment. However, we also find significant contestation concerning its potential enactment and its normative and strategic merit. Underlying these contestations, we identify the persistence of a normal view of science and decisionist understanding of risk assessment, which create conflicting legitimacy demands for BfR and other regulatory scientific organizations. Together with concerns about imbalances in the power to participate, especially in highly specialized engagement processes, these pose significant challenges for the institutionalization of more participatory practices
Business · Citizen journalism · Corporate governance · Engineering ethics · Institutionalisation · Legitimacy · Management · Normative · Political science · Politics · Public engagement · Public relations · Risk assessment · Risk Governance · Sociology · Engineering · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Regulation and Compliance Studies
The Wetland Explorer
International perspectives on the meaning of engagement in biotechnology risk assessment
Summary of the ONE Society track > opportunities and challenges
Participatory versus analytic approaches for understanding risk perceptions
Participatory Science Communication Through Consensus Conferences
Regulating Gene Editing in the Wild
The fifth branch
Scientific expertise and political accountability
Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy
Stakeholder engagement in food risk management
Why should we promote public engagement with science
DuPont and Environmental Defense Fund Co-Constructing a Risk Framework for Nanoscale Materials
Scientists as policy actors
Eu Food Safety Policy
Domesticating participation
Can food safety policy-making be both scientifically and democratically legitimated? If so, how
On being all things to all people
Technologies of Humility
Only Good Fences Keep Good Neighbours! The Institutionalization of Ministry–agency Relationships at the Science–policy Nexus in German Food Safety Policy
Research institutes as hybrid organizations
Expertise, Regulatory Science and the Evaluation of Technology and Risk
Regulatory science—Towards a sociological framework
Science for the post-normal age
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Social Knowledge in the Making
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk
The Paradox of Participation Experiments
A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms
Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science
A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology
Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology
Opening Up" and "Closing Down
Locating Scientific Citizenship
Science and Power in Global Food Regulation
Is Community-Based Participatory Research Postnormal Science
Deliberating Competence
From Risk Assessment to Knowledge Mapping
Explaining Society, Critical Realism in the Social Sciences
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |