Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Increasing Engagement in Regulatory Science

Reflections from the Field of Risk Assessment

Bibliographic Data

ID5337002
AuthorsLeonie Dendler (0000-0003-4442-5273, Department Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany, corresponding author), Gaby-Fleur Böl (Department Risk Communication, German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment, Berlin, Germany), Gaby‐Fleur Böl (Federal Institute for Risk Assessment)
Year2021
Volume46
Issue4
Pages719-754
Publication date2021-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243920944499
OpenAlexW3048130121
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited51

While the demands for greater engagement in science in general and regulatory science in particular have been steadily increasing, we still face limited understanding of the empirical resonance of these demands. Against this context, this paper presents findings from a recent study of a potential participatory opening of the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment ("Bundesinstitut für Riskobewertung" [BfR]), a prominent regulatory scientific organization in the field of risk governance. Drawing upon quantitative surveys of the public and selected professional experts as well as in-depth qualitative expert interviews, we identify a general support for greater engagement in science-based risk assessment. However, we also find significant contestation concerning its potential enactment and its normative and strategic merit. Underlying these contestations, we identify the persistence of a normal view of science and decisionist understanding of risk assessment, which create conflicting legitimacy demands for BfR and other regulatory scientific organizations. Together with concerns about imbalances in the power to participate, especially in highly specialized engagement processes, these pose significant challenges for the institutionalization of more participatory practices

Business · Citizen journalism · Corporate governance · Engineering ethics · Institutionalisation · Legitimacy · Management · Normative · Political science · Politics · Public engagement · Public relations · Risk assessment · Risk Governance · Sociology · Engineering · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • The Wetland Explorer

    Open Access•Catharina Landström, Helge Peters et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2025

  • International perspectives on the meaning of engagement in biotechnology risk assessment

    Open Access•Sarah Hartley, Aleksandra Stelmach et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • Summary of the ONE Society track > opportunities and challenges

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Lynn Frewer et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2023

  • Participatory versus analytic approaches for understanding risk perceptions

    Open Access•Leonie Dendler, Mariana Costa Oliveira Morais et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2023

  • Participatory Science Communication Through Consensus Conferences

    Open Access•Leonie Dendler•Science Communication•2022

  • Regulating Gene Editing in the Wild

    Open Access•Karen J Maschke, Michael K Gusmano•The Hastings Center Report•2021

  • The fifth branch

    Sheila Jasanoff•The fifth branch•1994

  • Scientific expertise and political accountability

    P Weingart•Science and Public Policy•1999

  • Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses

    Royston Greenwood, Mia Raynard et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2011

  • ‘Democratising’ expertise, ‘expertising’ democracy

    ANGELA LIBERATORE, Silvio Funtowicz•Science and Public Policy•2003

  • Stakeholder engagement in food risk management

    Open Access•John Walls, Gene Rowe et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2011

  • Why should we promote public engagement with science

    Open Access•Jack Stilgoe, Simon J Lock et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • DuPont and Environmental Defense Fund Co-Constructing a Risk Framework for Nanoscale Materials

    Open Access•Lotte Krabbenborg•NanoEthics•2013

  • Scientists as policy actors

    Open Access•Paul Upham, Leonie Dendler•Environmental Science & Policy•2014

  • Eu Food Safety Policy

    Open Access•Lotte Holm, Bente Halkier et al.•European Societies•2009

  • Domesticating participation

    Henry Rothstein•Journal of Risk Research•2013

  • Can food safety policy-making be both scientifically and democratically legitimated? If so, how

    Open Access•Erik Millstone•Journal of Agricultural and…•2007

  • On being all things to all people

    Open Access•John N Parker, John Parker et al.•Social Studies of Science•2012

  • Technologies of Humility

    Open Access•Sheila Jasanoff•Minerva•2003

  • Only Good Fences Keep Good Neighbours! The Institutionalization of Ministry–agency Relationships at the Science–policy Nexus in German Food Safety Policy

    Open Access•Rebecca-Lea Korinek, REBECCA‐LEA KORINEK et al.•Public Administration•2014

  • Research institutes as hybrid organizations

    Open Access•M Gulbrandsen•Policy Sciences•2011

  • Expertise, Regulatory Science and the Evaluation of Technology and Risk

    Open Access•David Demortain•Minerva•2017

  • Regulatory science—Towards a sociological framework

    Open Access•Alec Irwin, Alan Irwin et al.•Futures•1997

  • Science for the post-normal age

    Open Access•Silvio Funtowicz, Silvio O Funtowicz et al.•Futures•1993

  • A Ladder Of Citizen Participation

    Sherry R Arnstein•Journal of the American Institute…•1969

  • Social Knowledge in the Making

    Charles Camic, Neil Gro et al.•Social Knowledge in the Making•2011

  • Dilemmas in a general theory of planning

    Open Access•Horst W J Rittel, Melvin M Webber•Policy Sciences•1973

  • Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk

    Open Access•Daniel J Fiorino•Science Technology & Human Values•1990

  • The Paradox of Participation Experiments

    Open Access•Alexander Bogner•Science Technology & Human Values•2012

  • A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms

    Open Access•Gene Rowe, Lynn J Frewer•Science Technology & Human Values•2005

  • Boundary Organizations in Environmental Policy and Science

    Open Access•David H Guston•Science Technology & Human Values•2001

  • A Democracy Paradox in Studies of Science and Technology

    Open Access•Eva Lövbrand, Roger Pielke et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2011

  • Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology

    Open Access•Martin Lengwiler•Science Technology & Human Values•2008

  • Opening Up" and "Closing Down

    Open Access•Andy Stirling•Science Technology & Human Values•2008

  • Locating Scientific Citizenship

    Open Access•Karen Bickerstaff, Irene Lorenzoni et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2010

  • Science and Power in Global Food Regulation

    Open Access•David E Winickoff, Douglas M Bushey et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2010

  • Is Community-Based Participatory Research Postnormal Science

    Open Access•David Bidwell•Science Technology & Human Values•2009

  • Deliberating Competence

    Open Access•Jason Chilvers•Science Technology & Human Values•2008

  • From Risk Assessment to Knowledge Mapping

    Open Access•Andy Stirling, Andy C Stirling et al.•Conservation Ecology•2009

  • Explaining Society, Critical Realism in the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Freddy Winston Castro•Acta Sociologica•2002

Unique citing works6
Citations per year1,2
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae