Geoengineering, Ocean Fertilization, and the Problem of Permissible Pollution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5337261 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Benjamin Hale (0000-0002-8872-8180, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA,, corresponding author), Lisa Dilling (0000-0001-5061-0809, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 190-212 |
| Publication date | 2011-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243910366150 |
| OpenAlex | W2107511623 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 21 |
Many geoengineering projects have been proposed to address climate change, including both solar radiation management and carbon removal techniques. Some of these methods would introduce additional compounds into the atmosphere or the ocean. This poses a difficult conundrum: Is it permissible to remediate one pollutant by introducing a second pollutant into a system that has already been damaged, threatened, or altered? We frame this conundrum as the ''Problem of Permissible Pollution.'' In this paper, we explore this problem by taking up ocean fertilization and advancing an argument that rests on three moral claims. We first observe that pollution is, in many respects, a context-dependent matter. This observation leads us to argue for a ''justifiability criterion.'' Second, we suggest that remediating actions must take into account the antecedent conditions that have given rise to their consideration. We call this second observation the ''antecedent conditions criterion.'' Finally, we observe that ocean fertilization, and other related geoengineering technologies, propose not strictly to clean up carbon emissions, but actually to move the universe to some future, unknown state. Given the introduced criteria, we impose a ''future-state constraint''. We conclude that ocean fertilization is not an acceptable solution for mitigating climate change. In attempting to shift the universe to a future state (a) geoengineering sidelines consideration of the antecedent conditions that have given rise to it -conditions, we note, that in many cases involve unjustified carbon emissions -and (b) it must appeal to an impossibly large set of affected parties
Climate change · Geoengineering · Geography · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Computer Science · Environmental Science · Space exploration and regulation · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Geology · Oceanography
Reimagining Science Education in the Anthropocene, Volume 2
Negative emissions—Part 3
Negative emissions—Part 1
Using Twentieth-Century U.S. Weather Modification Policy to Gain Insight into Global Climate Remediation Governance Issues
Why and Where to Fund Carbon Capture and Storage
The Ethics of Geoengineering
Making waste management public (or falling back to sleep)
Consenting to Geoengineering
In search of better methods for the longitudinal assessment of tech-derived X-risks
Dealing with the uncertainties of climate engineering
Science, morality and method in environmental discourse
| Citations per year | 0.85 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2013 - 2024 (12) |
| Highly cited | No |