Do Artifacts Have Political Economy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5337335 |
|---|---|
| Authors | K Birch (0000-0003-2881-4623, Institute for Technoscience & Society, York University, Toronto, Canada, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01622439251352167 |
| OpenAlex | W4412950721 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 63 |
Harking back to Langdon Winner's now classic essay "Do artifacts have politics?," my aim in this article is to ask a very similar question-namely, do artifacts have political economy? Following Winner and with the same objective in mind, I analyze artifacts that: (1) have been designed in ways that embed particular political economies; or (2) are compatible with particular political economies. I illustrate the former using Winner's own example of Robert Moses and the design of bridges in New York City. For the latter, I illustrate a strong and weak version of the compatibility claim, with the strong version characterized by the adoption of both a particular technology and political economy while the weak version is characterized by the adaptation of the social context to a particular technology and political economy. I use the example of advertising technology ("adtech") and generative artificial intelligence respectively to illustrate these two versions. I frame this discussion within an approach I define as constructivist political economy sitting at the interface of science and technology studies and political economy, which can provide a useful analytical tool to analyze and address the vagaries of contemporary technoscientific capitalism
Business · Economic system · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Cybernetics and Technology in Society · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Law · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
Biocapital
Markets in the Making
The Provoked Economy
Cybernetic Revolutionaries
Science-Mart
Amazon Echo and the Aesthetics of Whiteness
Tools of the trade
The Social shaping of technology
Academic Capitalism and the New Economy
Oligarchy, State, and Cryptopia
Assetization
Data as asset? The measurement, governance, and valuation of digital personal data by Big Tech
Do Artifacts Have Politics
Encountering Innovation, Countering Innovation
The steep cost of capture
Going with the flow
Capitalisms, Generative Projects and the New STS
Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Techno-Optimism
The Genealogy of “Empirical Post-structuralist” STS, Retold in Two Conjunctures
Amazon’s Ring
Big Tech
Big Tech
Introduction
The future(s) of open science
How sanitary pads came to save the world
Reflexive expectations in innovation financing
The Internet of Landlords
A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis
Science as a Vocation in the 1990s
Assetization as a mode of techno-economic governance
A New Political Sociology of Science
Sorting out economic forms
Do Politics Have Artefacts
Material Markets
Putting the Power in 'Socio-Technical Regimes' - E-Mobility Transition in China as Political Process
The Performativity of AI-powered Event Detection
Innovation in Technology Instead of Thinking? Assetization and Its Epistemic Consequences in Academia
Technoscience Rent
Humanly Extended Automation or the Future of Work Seen through Amazon Patents
Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy
Physics and Finance
Marx and the Machine
The Scientific Life
Peripheral Vision
Simians, Cyborgs, and Women
The Capitalization of Almost Everything
The Epistemization of Economic Transactions
The longest second
Economization, part 1
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 6 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |