Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

(Re)Producing Cyborgs

Biomedicalizing Abortion through the Congressional Debate over Fetal Pain

Bibliographic Data

ID5337338
AuthorsAshlyn Jaeger (University of California, Davis, CA, USA), Ashlyn M Jaeger (University of California, Davis, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume44
Issue1
Pages74-96
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243918783523
OpenAlexW2809554445
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited21

The scientific and political debate over whether a fetus can experience pain highlights a vital and controversial boundary for governance-the boundary of human life. I use the 2012 and 2013 US federal debates over twenty-week abortion bans (also known as fetal pain laws) to investigate how personhood is constructed in a society transformed by biomedical science and technology in the United States. Although those who support and oppose the bill take different stances on abortion regulation, each relies on biomedical knowledge and risk assessment to substantiate claims. Through content analysis of congressional documents, I find that members of Congress strategically draw on biomedical discourse to manage the boundaries of bodies and construct a universal "at-risk" political subject in need of governmental protection. These findings bring scholarly debates about personhood into the era of biomedicalization by emphasizing the latent process of creating a hybridized subjectivity that I call cybernetic personhood

Abortion · Bioethics · Boundary-work · Corporate governance · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Management · Personhood · Political science · Politics · Pregnancy · Social science · Sociology · Subjectivity · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Philosophy · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Struggles for Reproductive Justice in the Era of Anti-Genderism and Religious Fundamentalism

    Open Access•Rebecca Selberg, Marta Kolankiewicz et al.•Struggles for Reproductive…•2023

  • Complex decision-making of people's use of opioid agonist therapy during pregnancy

    Open Access•Ruth A Schmidt, Amaya Perez-Brumer et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • Designs on Nature

    Sheila Jasanoff•Designs on Nature•2005

  • Fetal Subjects, Feminist Positions

    Lynn M Morgan, Meredith Wilson Michaels•Fetal Subjects, Feminist Positions•1999

  • Baby's First Picture

    Lisa M Mitchell•Baby's First Picture•2001

  • Testing Women, Testing the Fetus

    Rayna Rapp•Testing Women, Testing the Fetus•2004

  • The Politics of Life Itself

    Nikolas Rose•The Politics of Life Itself•2007

  • Biomedicalization

    Open Access•Adele E Clarke, Laura Mamo et al.•American Sociological Review•2003

  • Visualising abortion

    Open Access•N Hopkins, Suzanne Zeedyk et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2005

  • Using Gender to Undo Gender

    Open Access•Judith Lorber•Feminist Theory•2000

  • Foetal personhood and representations of the absent child in pregnancy loss memorialization

    Open Access•Helen Keane•Feminist Theory•2009

  • Simians, Cyborgs, and Women

    Donna Haraway•Simians, Cyborgs, and Women•2013

  • Situated Knowledges

    Donna Haraway•Feminist Studies•1988

  • Cyborg Babies

    Open Access•Susan Marken•American Ethnologist•1999

  • Re-visioning Ultrasound through Women's Accounts of Pre-abortion Care in England

    Open Access•Siân M Beynon‐jone, Siân M Beynon-Jone et al.•Gender & Society•2015

  • The Cyborg Embryo

    Open Access•Franklin, Sarah Franklin•Theory Culture & Society•2006

  • With This You Can Meet Your Baby

    Open Access•Rebecca Howes‐mischel•Medical Anthropology Quarterly•2016

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae