Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Social Warp of Science

Writing the History of Genetic Engineering Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID5337368
AuthorsWright (0000-0002-8124-4335, University of Michigan, corresponding author), Susan Wright (0000-0002-9290-6242)
Year1993
Volume18
Issue1
Pages79-101
Publication date1993-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/016224399301800105
PMID11652076
OpenAlexW2163126418
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited26

Traditional empiricism, although largely abandoned, has marked the social studies of science through the persistent division between macrolevel analysis of the institutions promoting and regulating science and microlevel analysis of the laboratory, theories, and experiments. Further traces appear in the largely separate methodologies used in social studies of science, which do not draw from political theory, and studies in political theory, which are silent with respect to the expression of power in the development of science. Poststructuralist conceptions of science have reinforced this divcsion by encour aging a turn away from explanations that assume human agency and accountability . This article attempts to bridge the present methodological gulf between political theory and the social studies of science through methods that are sensitive to the nature and operation of power and to its expression in discourse. The application of these methods in the study of genetic engineering policy m the United States and the United Kingdom is outlined

Economics · Epistemology · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Social science · Social theory · Sociology · Biotechnology and Related Fields · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Risk Perception and Management

  • Reliable Knowledge and Unreliable Stuff

    Edward W Constant•Technology and Culture•1999

  • Vierter Gentechnologiebericht

    Open Access•Julia Diekämper, Heiner Fangerau et al.•Vierter Gentechnologiebericht•2018

  • GMO regulation and civic participation at the “edge of the world”

    Open Access•Richard Hindmarsh, Rosemary Du Plessis•New Genetics and Society•2008

  • Genetic engineering regulation in Australia

    Richard Hindmarsh•Science as Culture•2005

  • Framing GM crops as a food security solution

    Open Access•Jacqui Dibden, David Gibbs et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2011

  • Competitiveness versus ‘clean and green’? The regulation and governance of GMOs in Australia and the UK

    Open Access•Chris Cocklin, Jacqui Dibden et al.•Geoforum•2007

  • Multifunctionality

    Open Access•Jacqui Dibden, Chris Cocklin•Environment and Planning A…•2009

  • Power

    Open Access•Steven Lukes•Power•1974

  • The Social construction of technological systems

    T J Pinch, Thomas Parke Hughes et al.•The Social construction of…•1989

  • Power and poverty

    Morton S Baratz, Peter Bachrach•Power and poverty•1971

  • History in Crisis? The Others' Side of the Story

    Joan Wallach Scott•The American Historical Review•1989

  • Essays in Social Theory

    Open Access•Steven Lukes•Essays in Social Theory•1977

  • A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition

    Robert A Dahl•Preface to Democratic Theory•2006

  • Towards a theory of communicative competence

    Jürgen Habermas, Nicole Curato•Inquiry•1970

  • Power

    Open Access•Steven Luke, Steven Lukes•Power•1974

  • Following Scientists Around

    Open Access•Steven Shapin•Social Studies of Science•1988

  • Interests and Explanation in the Social Study of Science

    Open Access•Steve Woolgar•Social Studies of Science•1981

  • On the 'Hows' and 'Whys' of Cultural Change (Response to Woolgar)

    Open Access•Barry Barnes•Social Studies of Science•1981

  • On Interests and their Transformation

    Open Access•Michel Callon, John Law•Social Studies of Science•1982

  • Interests, Positivism and History

    Open Access•Donald Mackenzie•Social Studies of Science•1981

  • Molecular Biology or Molecular Politics? The Production of Scientific Consensus on the Hazards of Recombinant DNA Technology

    Open Access•Wright•Social Studies of Science•1986

  • Technology and Society The Social Construction of Technological Systems

    Susan J Douglas•Isis•1990

  • Foucault on Power

    Open Access•Mark Philp•Political Theory•1983

  • Science Studies in the 1990s

    Open Access•Dorothy Nelkin•Science Technology & Human Values•1989

  • Recombinant DNA Technology and Its Social Transformation, 1972-1982

    Wright, Susan Wright•Osiris•1986

  • Two Faces of Power

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1962

  • The Theory of Practice and the Practice of Theory

    Jan Golinski•Isis•1990

  • Nondecisions and the Study of Local Politics

    Open Access•Raymond E Wolfinger•American Political Science Review•1971

  • Decisions and Nondecisions

    Open Access•Peter Bachrach, Morton S Baratz•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Urban Politics

    Open Access•James Simmie•Sociology•1980

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,26
Citation span1999 - 2018 (20)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae