Changing Infrastructural Practices
Routine and Reproducibility in Automated Interdisciplinary Bioscience
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 5337485 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Robert Meckin (0000-0003-1071-9679, Sociology, University of Manchester, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2020 |
| Volumen | 45 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 1220-1241 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2020-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243919893757 |
| PMID | 32904024 |
| OpenAlex | W2995975064 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 6 |
| Referencias citadas | 40 |
Proponents of engineering and design approaches to biology aim to make interdisciplinary bioscience research faster and more reproducible. This paper outlines and deploys a practice-based approach to analyses of infrastructure that focuses on the routine epistemic activities and charts how two such routines are unsettled and resettled in the background of epistemic culture. This paper describes attempts to bring about new research infrastructures in synthetic biology using robotics and software-enabled design. A focus on the skills of pipetting shows how established manual labor has to be reconfigured to fit with novel robotic automations. An analysis of curating frozen materials shows that automated design presents new problems for the established activities of storing and retrieving biological materials. These movements, while transient, have implications for organizing interdisciplinary collaboration, research productivity, and enabling greater reproducibility. This paper explores the idea of infrastructure as practice and shows how this has important implications for studies of research infrastructures. This article discusses the main contributions of this approach for analysts of infrastructure in terms of movements, temporalities, and ethics and offers suggestions for what the research implies for synthetic biology
Biology · Data science · Engineering ethics · Management science · Political science · Productivity · Robot · Robotics · Sociology · Synthetic biology · Temporalities · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence · Scientific Computing and Data Management · Artificial Intelligence
Shaping technology/building society
International Handbook of Internet Research
Culturing Life
Data-Centric Biology
Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure
Knowledge Infrastructures
A measure of ‘environmental happiness’
Knowledge infrastructures
Toward Information Infrastructure Studies
The Shape of Actions
The Site of the Social
Sorting Things Out
Engineering Biology and Society
Making big promises come true? Articulating and realizing value in synthetic biology
Making Biology Easier to Engineer
Infrastructuring Environments
Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects
The informational turn in food politics
Organizing for ontological change
Anyone can edit’, not everyone does
The hospital and the hospital
Realizing the promise of biotechnology
Human-Machine Reconfigurations
After Method
Affective Infrastructure
Consumption and Theories of Practice
Seamful Spaces
The Ethnography of Infrastructure
The Mangle of Practice
Toward a Theory of Social Practices
Conceptualizing connections
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 6 |