Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Pharmaceutical Commons

Sharing and Exclusion in Global Health Drug Development

Datos Bibliográficos

ID5337565
AutoresJavier Lezaun (0000-0002-5483-3628, University of Oxford), Catherine M Montgomery (0000-0002-5829-6137, Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research (AISSR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, autor de correspondencia)
Año2015
Volumen40
Número1
Páginas3-29
Fecha de publicación2015-01-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243914542349
PMID25866425
PMCIDPMC4361701
OpenAlexW2101589578
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas42
Referencias citadas43

In the last decade, the organization of pharmaceutical research on neglected tropical diseases has undergone transformative change. In a context of perceived "market failure," the development of new medicines is increasingly handled by public-private partnerships. This shift toward hybrid organizational models depends on a particular form of exchange: the sharing of proprietary assets in general and of intellectual property rights in particular. This article explores the paradoxical role of private property in this new configuration of global health research and development. Rather than a tool to block potential competitors, proprietary assets function as a lever to attract others into risky collaborative ventures; instead of demarcating public and private domains, the sharing of property rights is used to increase the porosity of that boundary. This reimagination of the value of property is connected to the peculiar timescape of global health drug development, a promissory orientation to the future that takes its clearest form in the centrality of "virtual" business models and the proliferation of strategies of deferral. Drawing on the anthropological literature on inalienable possessions, we reconsider property's traditional exclusionary role and discuss the possibility that the new pharmaceutical "commons" proclaimed by contemporary global health partnerships might be the precursor of future enclosures

Business · Commons · Economics · Global commons · Intellectual property · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Biotechnology and Related Fields · Intellectual Property and Patents · Law · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy

  • Genomic and Viral Sovereignty

    Amy Hinterberger, Natalie Porter•Public Culture•2015

  • Market Failures and Market Framings

    Open Access•Geiger, Susi Geiger et al.•Organization Studies•2017

  • Responsible innovation in synthetic biology in response to Covid-19

    Open Access•Koen Bruynseels•Ethics and Information Technology•2021

  • Covid-19 vaccines, public health goods and Catholic social teaching

    Open Access•Vivencio Ballano•HTS Teologiese Studies /…•2022

  • Profiles of Malaria Research in Portugal

    Open Access•Ana Ferreira, Ana Lúcia Teixeira•Science & Technology Studies•2019

  • Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2019

    Francesco Luzzini•Isis•2019

  • Assetization and the ‘new asset geographies’

    Open Access•K Birch, Callum Ward•Dialogues in Human Geography•2022

  • Wars and sweets

    Open Access•Coll De Lima Hutchison•Medical Humanities•2022

  • Patents as Capitalist Aesthetic Forms

    Open Access•Hyo Yoon Kang•Law and Critique•2023

  • From Standardization to Adaptation

    Catherine M Montgomery•Science as Culture•2016

  • International Ties at Peripheral Sites

    Leandro Rodriguez Medina, Hugo Ferpozzi et al.•Science as Culture•2019

  • The common production of economic advantages

    Open Access•Marlen van den Ecker, Tilman Reitz et al.•Critical Sociology•2025

  • Equivocal diagnostics

    Open Access•A Street, Elizabeth M Taylor et al.•Social Studies of Science•2024

  • The Open Pharma Movement

    Open Access•Nicole Foti•Social Studies of Science•2025

  • How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice

    Open Access•Nadine Levin, Sabina Leonelli et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2016

  • When nature goes digital

    Open Access•Koen Bruynseels•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2020

  • Ebola vaccine innovation

    Open Access•Janice Graham•Critical Public Health•2019

  • (De-)assetizing pharmaceutical patents

    Open Access•Théo Bourgeron, Geiger•Economy and Society•2022

  • Constructing digital assets through blockchain technologies? Unpacking the techno-economic configuration of non-fungible tokens

    Open Access•А А Мирошниченко, Alia Miroshnichenko et al.•Social Studies of Science•2024

  • The commercial roots of the genomic commons

    Open Access•Steve Sturdy•Social Studies of Science•2025

  • The pharmaceutical commons

    Open Access•Geiger, Tineke Kleinhout‐Vliek•BioSocieties•2026

  • Public-Private Partnerships and the Landscape of Neglected Tropical Disease Research

    Open Access•Hugo Ferpozzi•Minerva•2023

  • Understanding the care.data conundrum

    Open Access•Paraskevas Vezyridis, Stephen Timmon et al.•Big Data & Society•2017

  • Patents and the challenge of ‘open source’ in an emergent biological commons or … the strange case of Betty Crocker and the mouse

    Open Access•Bronwyn Parry•BioSocieties•2020

  • The social shaping of biotechnological innovation. The case of Covid-19 protein vaccine in Cuba and the US

    Open Access•Claudio Marciano•BioSocieties•2025

  • Molecular sovereignties

    Open Access•Eva Hilberg•BioSocieties•2022

  • Value regimes and pricing in the pharmaceutical industry

    Open Access•Maurice Cassier•BioSocieties•2021

  • The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism

    Open Access•K Birch, Margaret Chiappetta et al.•Policy Studies•2020

  • Making vaccines investable in preclinical vaccine R&D

    Open Access•K Tawny Paul, K Paul et al.•Journal of Cultural Economy•2026

  • Market Devices and the Assetization of Neglected Diseases

    Open Access•Mady Malheiros Barbeitas•Science Technology & Human Values•2025

  • Technoscience Rent

    Open Access•K Birch•Science Technology & Human Values•2020

  • How Does One "Open" Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research

    Open Access•Nadine Levin, Sabina Leonelli•Science Technology & Human Values•2017

  • Rethinking Value in the Bio-economy

    Open Access•K Birch•Science Technology & Human Values•2017

  • Logged out

    Open Access•Barbara Prainsack•Big Data & Society•2019

  • Straight outta the tropics

    Open Access•Hugo Ferpozzi•Tapuya Latin American Science…•2020

  • The road ahead

    Open Access•Ana Aparicio•Tapuya Latin American Science…•2022

  • When more data means better results

    Open Access•C Pinel•Social Science Information•2020

  • Migrants, parasites et exploitation minière

    Open Access•Pablo Kreimer, Hugo Ferpozzi et al.•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2021

  • Make me a test and I will save the world

    Open Access•A Street•Journal of the Royal Anthropologica…•2023

  • More-than-national and less-than-global

    Open Access•Nele Jensen, A Barry et al.•Economy and Society•2023

  • Global Health, Accelerated

    Open Access•Ann H Kelly, Javier Lezaun et al.•Economy and Society•2022

  • The deferred promise of radical cure

    Javier Lezaun•Economy and Society•2018

  • Science-Mart

    Philip Mirowski•Science-Mart•2011

  • Drug development for neglected diseases

    Open Access•Patrice Trouiller, Piero Olliaro et al.•The Lancet•2002

  • Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?

    Open Access•Nathan Rosenberg•Research Policy•1990

  • On the monopoly

    Open Access•Kristin Peterson•American Ethnologist•2014

  • Novel constitutions? New regimes of openness in synthetic biology

    Open Access•Stephen Hilgartner•BioSocieties•2012

  • The politics of emergence

    Open Access•M Hodges•BioSocieties•2012

  • Ownership and sharing in synthetic biology

    Open Access•Jane Calvert•BioSocieties•2012

  • Illumination and Innovation

    M Moran, Michael Stevenson•Global Society•2013

  • Dockets, Deals, and Sagas

    Open Access•J Owen-Smith•Social Studies of Science•2005

  • The Contract Research Organization and the Commercialization of Scientific Research

    Open Access•Philip Mirowski, Robert Van Horn•Social Studies of Science•2005

  • The business of expectations

    Open Access•Neil Pollock, Robin Williams•Social Studies of Science•2010

  • Selective flows of knowledge in technoscientific interaction

    Open Access•Stephen Hilgartner•The British Journal for the…•2012

  • Inalienable Possessions

    Annette B Weiner, Annette Weiner•Inalienable possessions•1992

  • Theatres of virtue

    Open Access•Dinah Rajak•Focaal•2011

  • A Generic Solution

    Cori Hayden•Current Anthropology•2007

  • The Proper Copy

    Open Access•Cori Hayden•Journal of Cultural Economy•2010

Obras citantes distintas42
Citas por año3,82
Intervalo de citas2015 - 2026 (12)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 41
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae