Maximizing the Policy Impacts of Public Engagement
A European Study
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5337677 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Steven B Emery (Newcastle University), Henk A J Mulder (Science and Society Group, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands), Henk Mulder (0000-0003-4739-2665, University of Groningen), Lynn J Frewer (0000-0002-6494-3492, Newcastle University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 421-444 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Editora | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243914550319 |
| OpenAlex | W2136950867 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 25 |
| Referências citadas | 23 |
There is a lack of published evidence which demonstrates the impacts of public engagement (PE) in science and technology policy. This might represent the failure of PE to achieve policy impacts or indicate a lack of effective procedures for discerning the uptake by policy makers of PE-derived outputs. While efforts have been made to identify and categorize different types of policy impact, research has rarely attempted to link policy impact with PE procedures, political procedures, or the connections between them. In this article, we propose a simple conceptual model to capture this information, based on semistructured interviews with both policy makers and PE practitioners. A range of criteria are identified to increase the policy impact of PE. The role of PE practitioners in realizing impacts through their interactions with policy makers in the informal "in-between" spaces of public engagement is emphasized. However, the potential contradictions between the pursuit of policy impacts and the more traditional conceptualizations of PE effectiveness are discussed. The main barrier to the identification of policy impacts from PE may lie within policy processes themselves. Political institutions have responsibility to establish formalized procedures for monitoring the uptake and use of evidence from PE in their decision-making processes
Business · Categorization · Economics · Impact assessment · Management science · Policy analysis · Policy studies · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public engagement · Public involvement · Public policy · Public relations · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development · Public Administration · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Participation or involvement? Development of forest strategies on national and sub-national level in Germany
A theory of participation
STS boundary spanners
Best bang for your buck
Designing Participatory Technology Assessments
Isis Current Bibliography of the History of Science and Its Cultural Influences 2019
Interests and Influence
Whose input counts? Evaluating the process and outcomes of public consultation through the BC Water Act Modernization
Juggling Roles, Experiencing Dilemmas
Navigating tensions in inclusive conservation
Gestión de la comunicación científica de los proyectos de investigación en H2020. Funciones, modelos y estrategias
Summary of the ONE Society track > opportunities and challenges
Engaging informality
Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology
Responsible innovation through conscious contestation at the interface of agricultural science, policy, and civil society
Socio-economic status and authority deference
Science to the rescue or contingent progress? Comparing 10 years of public, expert and policy discourses on new and emerging science and technology in the United Kingdom
From engaging publics to engaging knowledges
There is nothing nano-specific here’
Human centred science and technology—transdisciplinary foresight and co-creation as tools for active needs-based innovation governance
A literature review on the relationship between risk governance and public engagement in relation to complex environmental issues
Perception et émergence d’une Boutique des sciences dans la région des Hauts-de-France
Perceptions of public land governance from two Canadian provinces
How universities study the future
The dark side of public participation
Stakeholder engagement and knowledge exchange in environmental research
Stakeholder participation for environmental management
Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics
Participatory Paradoxes
Bridges between Science, Society and Policy
Public engagement to build trust
Survey Article
Lost in Translation? The Need for ‘Upstream Engagement’ with Nanotechnology on Trial
The quality of food risk management in Europe
Participatory processes for designing environmental policies
Informing, involving or engaging? Science communication, in the ages of atom-, bio- and nanotechnology
Public Participation Methods
Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises
A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms
Deliberating Competence
Public Engagement for Informing Science and Technology Policy
| Obras citantes distintas | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,27 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 24 |