Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Disentrenching Experiment

The Construction of GM-Crop Field Trials As a Social Problem

Bibliographic Data

ID5337772
AuthorsChristophe Bonneuil (0009-0007-3463-4828, Centre A. Koyré d'Histoire des Sciences and INRA/TSV), Pierre-Benoit Joly (INRA/TSV), Pierre‐benoit Joly (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique), Claire Marris (0000-0002-9366-5567, INRA/TSV)
Year2008
Volume33
Issue2
Pages201-229
Publication date2008-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243907311263
OpenAlexW2171855791
LanguageEN
Citations received49
References cited27

The paper investigates how field experimentation of genetically modified crops became central to the French controversy on genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in recent years. Initially constructed in the 1980s as a cognitive endeavor to be preserved from lay interference, field trials of genetically modified crops were reconceived as "an intrusion in the social space," which had to be negotiated with actors from that space. In order to analyze this transformation, the authors suggest that it is necessary to develop an interpretive framework that combines theoretical perspectives from science and technology studies and the sociology of social problems, and emphasizes the importance of the way in which actors compete in a heterogeneous public space, to put forward alternative framings of problems. The authors present a detailed analysis of the interactions and conflicts between actors in diverse social arenas in order to better understand the dynamics of this sociotechnical controversy

Economics · Epistemology · Knowledge management · Political science · Sociology · Sociotechnical system · Computer Science · French Urban and Social Studies · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact

  • Transforming Participatory Science into Socioecological Praxis

    Open Access•Brian J Burke, Nik Heynen•Environment and Society•2014

  • Ethics in the Societal Debate on Genetically Modified Organisms

    Open Access•Yann Devos, Pieter Maeseele et al.•Journal of Agricultural and…•2007

  • La bioseguridad mexicana

    Open Access•J Foyer, Christophe Bonneuil•Revista Mexicana de Sociología•2015

  • Interactive Technology Assessment in the Real World

    Open Access•Claire Marris, Pierre-Benoit Joly et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2008

  • Les mondes agricoles en politique

    Antoine Bernard De Raymond•Les mondes agricoles en politique•2010

  • Citizen Social Science in Germany—cooperation beyond invited and uninvited participation

    Open Access•Claudia Göbel, Sylvi Mauermeister et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2022

  • Le débat autour des modèles épidémiologiques de la Covid-19. Apologistes, critiques et détracteurs

    Open Access•Fabrizio Li Vigni, Quentin Lobbé•Questions de communication•2026

  • Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy

    Open Access•Nicolas Béfort•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Carbon removal demonstrations and problems of public perception

    Open Access•L Waller, Emily Cox et al.•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2023

  • A materialist-idealist divide? Policy and practice in participatory mangrove rehabilitation in the Philippines

    Open Access•Clarissa Ruzol, Clarissa D Ruzol et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2020

  • Climate Change Controversies in French Mass Media 1990–2010

    Stefan C Aykut, Jean-Baptiste Comby et al.•Journalism Studies•2012

  • New wine in old bottles? The biotechnology problem in the history of molecular biology

    Open Access•Jean-Paul Gaudillière•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2009

  • National specificity and convergence in the European anti-GM movement

    Open Access•Franz Seifert•Innovation The European Journal…•2020

  • Turning Aggression into an Object of Intervention

    Francisca Grommé•Science as Culture•2015

  • Lost in Translation? The Need for ‘Upstream Engagement’ with Nanotechnology on Trial

    Pierre-Benoit Joly, Pierre‐benoit Joly et al.•Science as Culture•2008

  • The framings of the coexistence of agrifood models

    Open Access•Guillaume Ollivier, Pierre Gasselin et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2024

  • Charting the history of agricultural experiments

    Open Access•Giuditta Parolini•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2015

  • Big science’ in the field

    Open Access•Angela Cassidy•History & Philosophy of the Life…•2015

  • Imagination and technoscientific innovations

    Open Access•Brian P Bloomfield, Bill Doolin•Social Studies of Science•2010

  • Pharmaceutical prospects

    Open Access•Richard Milne•Social Studies of Science•2012

  • How does the World Trade Organization know? The mobilization and staging of scientific expertise in the GMO trade dispute

    Open Access•Christophe Bonneuil, L Levidow•Social Studies of Science•2012

  • The politics of buzzwords at the interface of technoscience, market and society

    Open Access•Bernadette Bensaude Vincent•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Science to the people! (and experimental politics)

    Open Access•Mathieu Quet•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Demonstrating the deep institutionalisation of de facto responsible research and innovation (rri) in participatory market contexts

    Open Access•Sally Randle, Allison Loconto et al.•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2024

  • L’agriculture à grande échelle

    Open Access•Nicolas Fortané•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2025

  • Large-scale agriculture

    Open Access•Marc-Olivier Déplaude, Nicolas Fortané et al.•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2025

  • La agricultura a gran escala

    Open Access•Marc-Olivier Déplaude, Nicolas Fortané et al.•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2025

  • Landwirtschaft in großem Maßstab

    Open Access•Marc-Olivier Déplaude, Nicolas Fortané et al.•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2025

  • The co-production of biotechnology and democratization in community science labs

    Open Access•Dan Santos•Science as Culture•2025

  • How Tech Trials Put Society to the Test

    Open Access•N Marres•Theory Culture & Society•2025

  • Assessing Nature? The Genesis of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (Ipbes)

    Open Access•Céline Granjou, Isabelle Mauz et al.•Science Technology and Society•2013

  • Negotiating the dynamics of uncomfortable knowledge

    Open Access•Claire Marris, Catherine Jefferson et al.•BioSocieties•2014

  • Opposition to the forensic use of DNA in France

    Open Access•Joëlle Vailly, Yasmine Bouagga•BioSocieties•2020

  • The land sparing – land sharing controversy

    Open Access•Allison Loconto, Marion Desquilbet et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Cell-cultured meat

    Open Access•J Mohorčich, Jacy Reese•Appetite•2019

  • Participación tecnocientífica en España

    Open Access•Guillem Palà, Joan Moyà-Köhler et al.•Papers Revista de Sociologia•2018

  • The Paradox of Participation Experiments

    Open Access•Alexander Bogner•Science Technology & Human Values•2012

  • Risk Assessment of Emerging Technologies and Post-Normal Science

    Open Access•Karen Kastenhofer•Science Technology & Human Values•2011

  • Articulating Scientific Practice with PROTEE

    Open Access•Helena Valve, Ruth Mcnally•Science Technology & Human Values•2013

  • Scientific Nonknowledge and Its Political Dynamics

    Open Access•Stefan Böschen, Karen Kastenhofer et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2010

  • Changing Social Order and the Quest for Justification

    Open Access•Tomiko Yamaguchi, Fumiaki Suda•Science Technology & Human Values•2010

  • Just Existing Is Resisting

    Open Access•Amaranta Herrero, R Binimelis et al.•Sociologia Ruralis•2017

  • Shoreline demos

    Open Access•L Waller, Emily Cox et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2025

  • The genetically modified organism shall not be refused? Talking back to the technosciences

    Open Access•Brandon Van Dyck, Barbara Van Dyck et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2022

  • The ambivalent regulator

    Open Access•Maite P Salazar, Daniel Valenzuela et al.•Tapuya Latin American Science…•2019

  • Más allá de la verdad científica

    Open Access•Mariana C Smulski•Antípoda Revista de Antropología…•2022

  • La politique en action

    Open Access•Pierre-Benoit Joly, Pierre‐benoit Joly•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2024

  • Les stations expérimentales comme lieux de production des savoirs agronomiques semi-confinés

    Open Access•Aurélie Cardona, Amélie Lefèvre et al.•Revue d'Anthropologie des…•2018

  • Genetically modified food in France

    Open Access•Kyoko Sato•Theory and Society•2013

  • Re-Thinking Science

    Helga Nowotny, Michael T Gibbons et al.•Re-Thinking Science•2013

  • The culture of public problems

    Joseph R Gusfield•The culture of public problems•1981

  • Risk Society

    Ulrich Beck•Risk Society•2013

  • The new production of knowledge

    Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny et al.•The new production of knowledge•1994

  • Social Worlds/Arenas Theory as Organizational Theory

    Adele E Clarke•Will Sustainability Fly?•2024

  • Governing Molecules

    Herbert Gottweis•Governing Molecules•1998

  • Designs on Nature

    Sheila Jasanoff•Designs on Nature•2005

  • Leçons politiques de l'épidémie de sida

    Open Access•Nicolas Dodier•Leçons politiques de l'épidémie…•2003

  • Les risques associés au largage dans l’environnement d’organismes génétiquement modifiés

    Open Access•Camille Limoges, Frances Anderson et al.•Cahiers de recherche sociologique•2011

  • Science and Public Policy

    H Smith, Hugh H Smith•American Journal of Public Health…•1948

  • Dossier Engagement public des chercheurs. Cultures épistémiques et engagement public des chercheurs dans la controverse OGM

    Open Access•Christophe Bonneuil•Natures Sciences Sociétés•2006

  • From Scientific Risk To Paysan Savoir-Faire

    Chaia Heller•Science as Culture•2002

  • Making a Place for Science

    Open Access•Christopher R Henke•Social Studies of Science•2000

  • Controversies as Informal Technology A ssessment

    Open Access•Arie Rip•Knowledge•1986

  • Regimes of Knowledge Production in Society

    Open Access•Dominique Pestre•Minerva•2003

  • Risk society

    Ulrich Beck•Risikogesellschaft•1992

  • The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making

    Open Access•Yves Surel•Journal of European Public Policy•2000

  • Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science

    Thomas F Gieryn•American Sociological Review•1983

  • Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation

    David A Snow, E Burke Rochford et al.•American Sociological Review•1986

  • La construction des problèmes publics. Définitions de situations dans des arènes publiques

    Daniel Cefaï•Réseaux•1996

  • Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Current Sociology•2002

  • Framing Processes and Social Movements

    Robert D Benford, David A Snow•Annual Review of Sociology•2000

  • The Rise and Fall of Social Problems

    Stephen Hilgartner, Charles L Bosk•American Journal of Sociology•1988

Unique citing works49
Citations per year2,58
Citation span2007 - 2026 (20)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 45

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae