Let's Not Talk About Science
The Normalization of Big Science and the Moral Economy of Modern Astronomy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5338232 |
|---|---|
| Authors | David Baneke (0000-0002-6920-9940, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 164-194 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0162243919846600 |
| OpenAlex | W2943757136 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 25 |
In the 1990s, the Dutch astronomical community had to choose its next big telescope project. The starting point of their discussions was not a plan in search of support, but a scientific community in search of a plan. Their discussion demonstrates how big science projects are an integral part of the moral and institutional economy of modern astronomy. Large telescopes are unique but not exceptional: big science has become part of "normal science," both scientifically and institutionally. In retrospect, the discussions anaylized in this paper discussions concern the earliest phase of three major astronomical instruments: the Atacama Large Millimeter Array (ALMA), the Square Kilometer Array (SKA), and the Low Frequency Array (LOFAR). Interestingly, the Dutch astronomers focused on what they called "strategic" arguments, explicitly excluding arguments regarding scientific merit. I demonstrate how this should be understood in the context of the moral economy of the community. This analysis, based on rich archive material and background interviews with key actors, adds to our understanding of big science or "megascience" in the post-Cold War era
Astronomy · Big data · Geography · LOFAR · Physics · Political science · Radio telescope · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · History and Developments in Astronomy · International Science and Diplomacy · Space exploration and regulation
Perceptions of fundamental science
Empiricism Must, but Cannot, Presuppose Real Causation
New path capture. Insights from the diversification process in mining regions
We Need a Cern for AI”
What is the Space for “Place” in Social Studies of Astronomy
Sustaining local opposition to Big Science
I Don't Care Who Rules in the White House
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,17 |
| Citation span | 2020 - 2025 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |