Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

When Gender Fits Self-Regulatory Preferences

The Impact of Regulatory Fit on Gender-Based Ingroup Favoritism

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5338609
AutoresKai Sassenberg (0000-0001-6579-8250), Paige C Brazy (University of Wisconsin–Madison), Karen Jonas (0000-0001-6607-1993, University of Amsterdam), Kai J Jonas, James Y Shah (Duke University)
Ano2013
Volume44
Fascículo1
Páginas4-15
Data de publicação2013-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoSocial Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1864-9335 • E-ISSN: 2151-2590
EditoraHogrefe Publishing Group (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1027/1864-9335/a000095
OpenAlexW2183934886
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas14
Referências citadas46

Females are perceived to have less power than males. These differences in perceived power might render different self-regulatory strategies appropriate: Women should (as members of other low-power groups) care about security, whereas men should (as members of other high-power groups) strive for accomplishment. These regulatory implications of gender provide the basis for regulatory fit between individuals' gender and their regulatory focus. Higher fit should lead to stronger gender-based ingroup favoritism: Prevention-focused females and promotion-focused males were expected to show more ingroup favoritism than both sexes in the respective other regulatory focus. According to the regulatory fit hypothesis, this effect should occur for evaluative- but not for stereotype-based ingroup favoritism. Three studies supported these hypotheses

Developmental psychology · In-group favoritism · Ingroups and outgroups · Political science · Power (physics) · Promotion (chess) · Regulatory focus theory · Social group · Social identity theory · Stereotype (UML) · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Charging ahead without her? Why women in the United States are less willing than men to purchase electric vehicles

    Open Access•Jessica NeJame, Hyeonsong Lee et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • The attraction of social power

    Open Access•Kai Sassenberg, Naomi Ellemers et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2011

  • Communication Campaigns to Support the Use of Nutritional Warnings

    Open Access•Gastón Ares, José Javier Díez González et al.•Health Education & Behavior•2021

  • Functional trade-offs in authentic pride and gender differences among U.S. undergraduates

    Open Access•Arin You, Daniel Fulford et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • The Gendered Benefits of Communication Strategies

    Open Access•M Asher Lawson, Sandra C Matz et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2026

  • Promotion focus is valued in men more than in women

    Open Access•Dinah Gutermuth, Melvyn R W Hamstra•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2024

  • Remembering Friends as Not So Friendly in Competitive and Bargaining Social Interactions

    Open Access•Sheldon Danziger, Shai Danziger et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2017

  • The roles of teacher and student gender in German teachers’ attitudes toward ethnic minority students

    Open Access•Hannah Kleen, Sabine Glock•Studies In Educational Evaluation•2018

  • If I can do it my way…The influence of regulatory focus on job-related values and job attraction

    Kai Sassenberg, Annika Scholl•Journal of Economic Psychology•2012

  • Linking regulatory focus and threat–challenge

    Open Access•Kai Sassenberg, Annika Scholl•European Review of Social…•2019

  • Room for advancement

    Open Access•Melvyn R W Hamstra, Bert Schreurs•European Journal of Social…•2018

  • Are there gender differences in promotion–prevention self‐regulatory focus

    Open Access•Dinah Gutermuth, Melvyn R W Hamstra•British Journal of Psychology•2024

  • Implicit language attitudes among young, white, L1-Afrikaans speakers towards two South African Englishes

    Open Access•Pedro Álvarez-Mosquera, Ian Bekker et al.•English World-Wide A Journal of…•2025

  • Voter Reasoning Bias When Evaluating Statements from Female and Male Political Candidates

    Open Access•Jens Koed Madsen•Politics & Gender•2019

  • Handbook of Social Psychology

    Daniel Todd Gilbert, Gardner Lindzey et al.•Handbook of Social Psychology•2012

  • Value from hedonic experience and engagement.

    E Tory Higgins•Psychological Review•2006

  • Regulatory Focus and Strategic Inclinations

    Open Access•Ellen Crowe, E Tory Higgins•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1997

  • Power, approach, and inhibition.

    Dacher Keltner, Deborah H Gruenfeld et al.•Psychological Review•2003

  • The social psychology of gender

    Laurie A Rudman, Peter Glick•Choice Reviews Online•2009

  • Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site

    Brian A Nosek, Mahzarin R Banaji et al.•Group Dynamics Theory Research…•2002

  • The measurement of psychological androgyny

    Sandra L Bem•Journal of Consulting and…•1974

  • The Go/No-Go Association Task

    Brian A Nosek, Mahzarin R Banaji•Social Cognition•2001

  • Implicit Self-Concept and Evaluative Implicit Gender Stereotypes

    Open Access•Laurie A Rudman, Anthony G Greenwald et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•2001

  • Group-based self-regulation

    Kai Sassenberg, Karl‐andrew Woltin et al.•European Review of Social…•2008

  • The Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory

    Open Access•Paul Glick, Peter Glick et al.•Psychology of Women Quarterly•1999

  • The Content and Function of Gender Self-stereotypes

    Open Access•Debra L Oswald, Kara Lindstedt•Sex Roles•2006

  • Who's in Charge? Effects of Situational Roles on Automatic Gender Bias

    Open Access•Jennifer A Richeson, Nalini Ambady•Sex Roles•2001

  • Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success

    Open Access•E Tory Higgins, Ronald S Friedman et al.•European Journal of Social…•2001

  • Don't ignore the other half

    Open Access•Kai Sassenberg, Frank Wieber•European Journal of Social…•2005

  • This story is right on”

    Open Access•Leigh Ann Vaughn, Sarah J Hesse et al.•European Journal of Social…•2009

  • The impact of regulatory focus on affective responses to social discrimination

    Open Access•Kai Sassenberg, Nina Hansen•European Journal of Social…•2007

  • Gender, Ethnicity, and Power

    Open Access•Felicia Pratto, Penelope Espinoza•Journal of Social Issues•2001

  • Variability in automatic activation as an unobstrusive measure of racial attitudes

    Russell H Fazio, Joni R Jackson et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • Performance incentives and means

    James Y Shah, James Shah et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1998

  • Non-conscious forms of system justification

    Open Access•John T Jost, Brett W Pelham et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2002

  • Evidence for the regulatory function of intergroup emotion

    Open Access•Angela T Maitner, Diane M Mackie et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2005

  • Less negative=more positive? Social discrimination as avoidance or approach

    Open Access•Kai Sassenberg, Thomas Kessler et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2003

  • Regulatory focus and executive function after interracial interactions

    Open Access•Sophie Trawalter, Jennifer A Richeson•Journal of Experimental Social…•2005

  • Making a good decision

    E Tory Higgins•American Psychologist•2000

  • Beyond pleasure and pain

    E Tory Higgins•American Psychologist•1997

  • Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes

    Russell H Fazio, Joni R Jackson et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • Emotional responses to goal attainment

    E Tory Higgins, James Shah et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • Gender Differences in Automatic In-Group Bias

    Laurie A Rudman, Stephanie A Goodwin•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004

  • Linguistic Signatures of Regulatory Focus

    Gün R Semin, Tory Higgins et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2005

  • Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures

    Bernd Wittenbrink, Charles M Judd et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • Why some groups just feel better

    Kai Sassenberg, Karen Jonas et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2007

  • Stereotype Threat and Performance

    Beate Seibt, Jens Förster•Journal of Personality and Social…•2004

  • Stereotype threat reinterpreted as a regulatory mismatch

    Lisa R Grimm, Arthur B Markman et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  • Fit to forgive

    Alexander G Santelli, C Ward Struthers et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2009

  • Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction

    John F Dovidio, Kiyoshi Kawakami et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002

  • Graphing the order of the sexes

    Peter Hegarty, A F Lemieux et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2010

  • Family Policies, Wage Structures, and Gender Gaps

    Open Access•H Mandel, M Semyonov•American Sociological Review•2005

  • Ideals and Oughts and the Reliance on Affect versus Substance in Persuasion

    Michel Tuan Pham, Tamar Avnet•Journal of Consumer Research•2004

Obras citantes distintas14
Citações por ano0,93
Intervalo de citações2011 - 2026 (16)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 12
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae