Medicalisation of Hysterectomy
A Qualitative Inquiry
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5339148 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Manjari Sinha (0009-0002-4098-3059, Symbiosis International University, corresponding author), M George (0000-0002-4893-3163, Central University of Kerala) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Publication date | 2025-10-05 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Society and Culture in South Asia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2393-8617 • E-ISSN: 2394-9872 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/23938617251380001 |
| OpenAlex | W4414843577 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 36 |
Hysterectomy is a surgical procedure that removes the uterus from the human body and is usually performed as a therapeutic response to gynaecological morbidities among women who have attained menopause. They are of different kinds depending on the intensity, such as partial, complete and radical. In several parts of the world, it is the second most common non-obstetric surgery after C-section. In India, too, hysterectomy has gained significant attention in health policy debates, as media reports highlight a surge in cases, particularly among young, premenopausal women from economically weaker sections, raising concerns over its increased prevalence and psychosocial and economic implications. This study investigates the contexts in which hysterectomies are prescribed by doctors and found that it is prescribed for less severe conditions like heavy menstrual bleeding that could otherwise be managed with oral medication or injections. Theoretically, overdoing of hysterectomy is practised and is conceptualised as an outcome of the societal discourse shaped by biomedical knowledge and practices. This is demonstrated based on the narratives from women who have undergone hysterectomies, supplemented by interviews with the doctors who performed these procedures. Interviews with two senior gynaecologists help triangulate key findings about medical practices followed for gynaecological morbidities and specifically for carrying out hysterectomies. The findings further highlight that the physical and emotional discomfort experienced by women during menstruation and its management and its consequences disrupt their daily activities and interfere with their livelihood opportunities, which in turn persuade several women to opt for hysterectomy as a definitive solution from monthly menstruation management challenges. The study reveals that the institutional, conceptual and interactional medicalisation creates an ecosystem that triggers hysterectomy as a primary medical intervention for a range of menstrual disorders and gynaecological morbidities and is closely linked to women's everyday experiences and economic concerns
Hysterectomy · Livelihood · Menstruation · Narrative · Psychosocial · Qualitative research · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception
Drugs for Life
The Evolution of Medical Uncertainty
Quick fix for care, productivity, hygiene and inequality
Stigma
Medicalising menstruation
Should `Premenstrual Syndrome' be Called a Psychiatric Abnormality
Incidence and determinants of hysterectomy in a low-income setting in Gujarat, India
Changing ideas
Pragmatic prevention, permanent solution
Prevalence of hysterectomy among rural and urban women with and without health insurance in Gujarat, India
Quality of Hysterectomy Care in Rural Gujarat
It's Way out of my League
The Social Construction of Illness
Medicalization and Social Control
The concept of medicalisation reassessed
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |