Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mutatis mutandis; or, Analogy and Justification in Simondon's System

Bibliographic Data

ID5339548
AuthorsAudrey Wasser (corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume54
Issue2
Pages189-206
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSubStance (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0049-2426 • E-ISSN: 1527-2095
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/sub.2025.a969742
OpenAlexW4414334369
LanguageEN

This article is about procedures of justification in Simondon's philosophical system. Broadly speaking, the article poses the question of what makes-or fails to make-Simondon's arguments convincing, what binds or grounds his analogies, what gives them their normative force. Focusing on Individuation in Light of Notions of Form and Information as well as on the important, shorter text, "Form, Information, and Potentials," it examines what Simondon calls his "analogical method" and explains how the method works as a justificatory procedure. And it raises the question of whether the analogical method assumes the perspective of a certain idealism, an idealism that would otherwise appear to run counter to what has been described as Simondon's objectivism, materialism, or philosophy of nature. In the end, to resolve these conflicting characterizations of Simondon's system, the article turns to debates about analogy in literary history, showing how literary analogy has similarly served to negotiate between the necessary and the contingent, inner and outer experience

Analogy · Idealism · Individuation · Normative · Perspective (graphical) · Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae