Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Five Models of Administrative Adjudication

Bibliographic Data

ID5344949
AuthorsMichael Asimow (Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume63
Issue1
Pages3-31
Publication date2015-04-15
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-919X • E-ISSN: 2326-9197
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5131/ajcl.2015.0001
OpenAlexW3124448353
LanguageEN
Citations received7

Journal Article Five Models of Administrative Adjudication Get access Michael Asimow Michael Asimow *Visiting Professor of Law, Stanford Law School. Professor of Law Emeritus, UCLA School of Law. Email: [email protected]. I acknowledge the assistance generously given to me by José M. Baño Fos, Yoav Dotan, and Robert Rabin. At later points in this paper, I will acknowledge the assistance provided by colleagues who assisted me to better understand the adjudication schemes of particular countries. Earlier versions of this paper were delivered at faculty seminars at Stanford Law School; Guanghua Law School, Zhejiang University (Hangzhou); Hebrew University Law School and Bar Ilan Law School (Israel); Torcuato di Telia School of Law and San Andres School of Law (Buenos Aires); and Chulalongkorn Faculty of Law (Bangkok). It was also presented at the annual conference of the Law & Society Association in San Francisco and at a conference of administrative law professors at the University of Luxembourg. I gratefully acknowledge the contributions of all of those who commented at these presentations Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar The American Journal of Comparative Law, Volume 63, Issue 1, Winter 2015, Pages 3–32, https://doi.org/10.5131/AJCL.2015.0001 Published: 01 January 2015

Adjudication · Commercial law · Comparative law · Hebrew · Law library · Library science · Political science · Public law · Sociology · Classics · Computer Science · History · International Arbitration and Investment Law · Law · Legal principles and applications · Ombudsman and Human Rights

  • How Different are the Models of Administrative Adjudication Across the Russian Regions? On the Example of Antitrust Cases

    Open Access•Elena Sidorova•Journal of Economic Sociology•2020

  • An International Due Process Standard for Competition Adjudication? A Critical Approach

    Open Access•Soojin Nam•Asian Journal of Comparative Law•2020

  • The EU institutional model of competition law enforcement evisited

    Open Access•Dijana Marković‐Bajalović•Pravni zapisi•2022

  • Challenging the State? Lawyers and the Reformed Administrative Appeals System in Japan

    Open Access•Rieko Kage•Law & Social Inquiry•2025

  • Checks and balances under pressure in the welfare state

    Open Access•Maarten Bouwmeester•European Journal of Social Security•2025

  • Procedural Justice and the Design of Administrative Dispute Resolution Procedures

    Open Access•Marc Wever, Jan Fekke Ybema•Social Justice Research•2024

  • Leveled odds? Attorney capability, team litigation, and outcomes in administrative patent cases

    Open Access•Banks Miller, Brett Curry•Law & Policy•2022

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,17
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae