The Mishnah's Reader
Reconsidering Literary Meaning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5348463 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Barry Scott Wimpfheimer (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 113 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 335-367 |
| Publication date | 2023-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Jewish Quarterly Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0021-6682 • E-ISSN: 1553-0604 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1353/jqr.2023.a904503 |
| OpenAlex | W4385990468 |
| Language | EN |
The Mishnah is both the best-organized work of rabbinic literature and not entirely consistent in its organization. These aspects led to robust scholarly debates about the Mishnah as a work of literature. Recent overview scholarship has highlighted the inconsistency and refused to attempt to define the Mishnah's literary genre. This essay draws on three common mishnaic phenomena to highlight the ways the Mishnah asks to be read. It argues that the Mishnah employs legal couplets (paired statutory case presentations) to communicate the presence of underlying conceptual meaning and to train the reader to mine the text for such meaning. It shows that the Mishnah stacks couplets like building blocks to produce ever-richer conceptual understandings of mishnaic information. Finally, it highlights and embraces the role that readers must play in producing the Mishnah's fullest meaning
Art · Epistemology · Literature · Meaning (existential) · Political science · Scholarship · Sociology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |