Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Jesus in Sasanian Babylonia

Bibliographic Data

ID5349451
AuthorsRichard Kalmin (corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume99
Issue1
Pages107-112
Publication date2009-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Jewish Quarterly Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-6682 • E-ISSN: 1553-0604
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/jqr.0.0036
OpenAlexW2036110951
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited1

Jesus in Sasanian Babylonia PETER SCHAfer. Jeaiut in the Talmud. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2007. Pp. xv + 210.AS PETER SCHAfer informs us in this important, powerful, and absorbing volume, Christian anti-Semitism and supersessionism on the one hand and Jewish apologetics on the other have marred earlier scholarly attempts to study Jesus 's portrayal in the Talmud. Most misguided, however, are those scholars, chief among them Johann Maier, who dismiss the talmudic traditions about Jesus as nonsensical rubbish on the grounds that they contain no reliable information about the historical Jesus. Maier, in fact, concludes that rabbinic literature refers in most instances to a Jesus other than Jesus of Nazareth, thinking thereby to have concluded the discussion and to have consigned the talmudic traditions to oblivion.1Schafer argues convincingly (1) that the talmudic traditions are speaking about Jesus of Nazareth; (2) that they contain no historically reliable evidence about the founder of Christianity independent of what can be found in Christian traditions; and (3) that these conclusions represent only the beginning of the story rather than the end. What the Talmud has to say on the subject, Schafer proposes, is of crucial importance because of what it tells us about fourth-century (and later) Jewish attitudes toward Jesus and Christianity. What the rabbis of Babylonia had to say about Jesus is not simply to be dismissed as bizarre nonsense but rather is to be appreciated as the rabbis' brilliant but bitter polemical responses to Christianity, the development and maturation of which had immense political, social, and religious consequences for Jews and against which they were engaged in a life and death struggle. The comments of the rabbis are couched in an idiom that is often foreign to nonspecialists, and these comments are often transmitted in the context of larger discussions concerned primarily with issues that seem strange to the uninitiated. It is necessary, therefore, to decipher the rabbis' comments and make them intelligible to those not immersed in rabbinic patterns of argumentation, and this is perhaps Schafer's most important contribution. In addition, Schafer repeatedly shows himself to be a skilled and sensitive exegete. Particularly innovative are his demonstrations of the interpretive importance of close attention not only to the immediate context of scriptural verses cited in rabbinic midrash but to the fuller context, whether the surrounding verses, the entire chapter, or even an entire biblical book.2As Schafer reads the evidence, the Talmud supplies us with fragments of a counter- Gospel, a Jewish perspective on the events of Jesus 's life, despite the fact that this counternarrative is preserved haphazardly and scattered throughout the pages of the Bavli, no more than a drop in the proverbial sea of the Talmud. This Jewish Gospel derives from a point of view hostile to Christianity and sympathetic to Judaism as understood and taught by the rabbis, in contrast to the New Testament Gospels, which are all, to differing degrees and in varying ways, hostile to Jews and Judaism. Schafer passionately insists that what the Talmud has to say about Jesus is important in its own right, and not simply for what it teaches us about Christian origins. The Talmud's statements about Jesus are often ferocious and at times even obscene (pp. 13, 82-94), but never gratuitously so, since these statements were the rabbis' ammunition against Christianity's core beliefs, which they used to make the case that Christianity was utterly false and that Jesus and his followers were hopelessly deluded. Those interested in the history of Jewish- Christian relations will find in these statements a perspective without parallel in other literatures, since the rabbis uttered these statements from a position of relative strength vis-a-vis the more vulnerable Christian communities of Sasanian Persia

Art · Christianity · Early Christianity · Historical Jesus · Judaism · Literature · Subject (documents) · Talmud · Theology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Classics · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Philosophy · Religious studies

  • Reimagining Enoch in Sasanian Babylonia in Light of Zoroastrian and Manichaean Traditions

    Open Access•Yishai Kiel•AJS Review The Journal of the…•2015

  • Jewish Babylonia between Persia and Roman Palestine

    Richard Kalmin•Jewish Babylonia between Persia…•2006

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,09
Citation span2015 - 2015 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae